banner

Knowledge interaction analysis of cooperative digital green innovation of photovoltaic building materials enterprises based on reciprocity theory

Yueyue Song, Yingying Zhang, Yudan Zhao, Shi Yin, Chengli Hu

Abstract


In the process of collaborative digital green innovation of photovoltaic building materials enterprises, knowledge sharing between photovoltaic building materials enterprises and academic and research institutions is conducive to the achievement of win-win goals of enterprises and academic and research institutions. However, due to the non-contractual relationship between cooperative subjects, it is difficult to observe the efforts of members, which is easy to cause poor information. Therefore, knowledge reciprocity incentive is particularly important. In this paper, the sequential reciprocity model is introduced to analyze the knowledge interaction between photovoltaic building materials enterprises, and academic and research institutions on cooperative green innovation. The results show that: (1) when the reciprocity sensitivity of academic and research institutions is large enough, academic and research institutions can feel the goodwill conveyed by the high effort level of knowledge sharing, and will reciprocate with friendly behavior. (2) When the reciprocity sensitivity of academic and research institutions is small, they will choose to pay a low level of effort in knowledge sharing. (3) When the reciprocity sensitivity of academic and research institutions is in the middle value, the higher effort level of the institutions will increase with the increase of reciprocity sensitivity of the institutions. In this paper, the sequential reciprocity model is introduced to study the reciprocity incentive effect of knowledge sharing in enterprise cooperative digital green innovation from the perspective of dynamic domain, in order to enrich the reciprocity theory and provide reference for the knowledge sharing incentive problem of enterprise cooperative digital green innovation.


Keywords


knowledge sharing incentive; photovoltaic building materials enterprises; digital green; sequential reciprocity model

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. Yang X. Research on the construction and application of sustainable development index system (Chinese). China Business Theory 2023; 1: 96–98. doi: 10.19699/j.cnki.issn2096-0298.2023.01.096

2. Bei J, Wang C. Renewable energy resources and sustainable development goals: Evidence based on green finance, clean energy and environmentally friendly investment. Resources Policy 2023; 80: 103194. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103194

3. Hayat MB, Ali D, Monyake KC, et al. Solar energy—A look into power generation, challenges, and a solar-powered future. International Journal of Energy Research 2018; 43(3): 1049–1067. doi: 10.1002/er.4252

4. Yin S, Dong T, Li B, Gao S. Developing a conceptual partner selection framework: digital green innovation management of prefabricated construction enterprises for sustainable urban development. Buildings 2022; 12(6), 721. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060721

5. Yan XF. Confidence for the Transformation of Energetic Work Promoting Development to Promote the Building Materials Industry Carbon Goal Smooth Realization of Peak-Carbon up to the Peak in the National Building Materials Industry Propulsion Conference Speech (Chinese). China Building Materials; 2022.

6. Zhang FY. Research on Low-Carbon Architectural Development Based on Green Life Cycle. Applied Mechanics & Materials 2014, 443: 263-267. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.443.263

7. Zong Y. Cost and economic benefit analysis of new energy industry in our country—Taking distributed photovoltaic power generation as an example (Chinese). Exhibition Economics 2022; 17: 128–131.

8. Tianfeng Securities Co., Ltd. Photovoltaic buildings: A new blue ocean of building materials under the background of carbon neutrality (Chinese). Stock Market Dynamics Analysis 2021; 8: 54.

9. Sun RH, Zhou S, Li L. Analysis on influencing factors of photovoltaic building integration development under the background of “dual carbon” (Chinese). Journal of Hunan University of Technology 2023; 37(2): 65–71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9833.2023.02.010

10. Fu R, James TL, Woodhouse, M. Economic measurements of polysilicon for the photovoltaic industry: Market competition and manufacturing competitiveness. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics 2015; 5(2): 515–524. doi: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2388076

11. Mao T. Zero-carbon supply chain is expected to reshape the global industrial chain (Chinese). Environmental Economics 2021; 22: 54–55.

12. Yin S, Zhang N, Ullah K, Gao S. Enhancing digital innovation for the sustainable transformation of manufacturing industry: a pressure-state-response system framework to perceptions of digital green innovation and its performance for green and intelligent manufacturing. Systems 2022; 10(3), 72. doi: 10.3390/systems10030072

13. Zhu X, Qi Y, Yang M, et al. Greening of Glass Packaging Viewed from Life Cycle and 3R1D Principles. China Academic Conference on Printing and Packaging. 2020.

14. Xue S, Zhao J, Yang T. Research on synergistic relationship between knowledge sharing, green innovation and infrastructure sustainable development (Chinese). Resources and Industries 2023; 25(1): 109–121. doi: 10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20220526.001

15. Long Y. Knowledge sharing value and interest coordination mechanism in competitive alliance (Chinese). Journal of Information 2011; 30(10): 123–12

16. Mir A, Rafique M, Mubarak N. Impact of Inclusive Leadership on Project Success: Testing of a Model in Information Technology Projects. International Journal of Information Technology Project Management (IJITPM) 2021; 12. doi: 10.4018/ijitpm.2016010104

17. Yin S, Yu Y. An adoption-implementation framework of digital green knowledge to improve the performance of digital green innovation practices for industry 5.0. Journal of Cleaner Production 2022; 363: 132608. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132608

18. Mcgrath T, Kapishnikov A, Tomaev N, et al. Acquisition of Chess Knowledge in Alpha Zero. arXiv e-prints 2021. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2111.09259

19. Xiao HY, Guo P. An evolutionary game study on knowledge sharing in cross-organization project cooperation considering knowledge potential difference (Chinese). Science of Science and Technology Management 2023; 44(9): 132–151.

20. Zhang YH, Zhou W, Huang MJ, Tang XQ. Stability of Duopoly Game based on delayed decision making and spillover effect (Chinese). Journal of Lanzhou Jiaotong University 2018; 37(1): 119–124.

21. Guo DW, Dai GX, Ma DQ. Research on knowledge sharing of industry-university-research collaborative innovation under the influence of delay effect (Chinese). Operations Research & Management 2022; 31(1): 224–231. doi: 10.12005/orms.2022.0033

22. Li G. The impact of supply chain relationship quality on knowledge sharing and innovation performance: evidence from Chinese manufacturing industry. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 2020. doi: 10.1108/JBIM-02-2020-0109

23. Qi LQ, Wu JY, Wang ZH. Evolutionary game of collaborative innovation network knowledge sharing in advanced manufacturing enterprises (Chinese). Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems 2023; 29(4): 1357–1370. doi: 10.13196/j.cims.2023.04.027

24. Liang Y, Zhao CH. How does psychological ownership affect the willingness of the entrepreneurial team members to share knowledge?—A multi-level empirical study (Chinese). Management Review 2022; 34(4): 185–193.

25. Hai-Wei G, Shu-Yue L. On How to Excavate the Value of Human Resource Data Information Resources in Construction Enterprises.Value Engineering, 2018.

26. Cheng JH. Inter-organizational relationships and knowledge sharing in green supply chains—Moderating by relational benefits and guanxi. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 2011; 47(6): 837–849. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2010.12.008

27. Zhang J, Ouyang Y, Philbin SP, et al. Green dynamic capability of construction enterprises: Role of the business model and green production. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 2020; 27(6): 2920–2940. doi: 10.1002/csr.2012

28. Luu TT. Fostering green service innovation perceptions through green entrepreneurial orientation: The roles of employee green creativity and customer involvement. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 2022; 34(7): 2640–2663. doi: 10.1108/IJCHM-09-2021-1136

29. Zameer H, Wang Y, Yasmeen H. Reinforcing green competitive advantage through green production, creativity and green brand image: Implications for cleaner production in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020; 247: 119119. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119119

30. Lin YH, Chen YS. Determinants of green competitive advantage: The roles of green knowledge sharing, green dynamic capabilities, and green service innovation. Quality & Quantity 2017; 51: 1663–1685. doi: 10.1007/s11135-016-0358-6

31. Song M, Yang MX, Zeng KJ, Feng W. Green knowledge sharing, stakeholder pressure, absorptive capacity, and green innovation: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Business Strategy and the Environment 2020; 29(3): 1517–1531. doi: 10.1002/bse.2450

32. Bi T, Liang P, Tang A, Xia X. Mining architecture tactics and quality attributes knowledge in stack overflow. Journal of Systems and Software 2021; 180: 111005. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.111005

33. Tavares AF, Camões PJ, Martins J. Joining the open government partnership initiative: An empirical analysis of diffusion effects. Government Information Quarterly 2023; 40(2): 101789. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101789

34. Taleizadeh AA, Noori-Daryan M, Sana SS. Manufacturing and selling tactics for a green supply chain under a green cost sharing and a refund agreement. Journal of Modelling in Management 2020. doi: 10.1108/JM2-01-2019-0016.

35. Jiang L, Liao H. Bounded rational reciprocal preference relation for decision making. Informatica 2022; 33(4): 731–748. doi: 10.15388/22-INFOR495

36. Yan C, Wang X, Zhang X, Xu R. On incentive and coordination mechanism of service outsourcing based on principal-agent theory and blockchain technology. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology 2023; 3(1): 1–9. doi: 10.37965/jait.2022.0144

37. Wei L. Research on incentive mechanism of enterprise knowledge sharing under reciprocal principality (Chinese). Information Exploration 2017; 238(8): 22–25.

38. Azam SMF, Tham J, Albattat A. Psycho-Social Perspectives of Knowledge Sharing and Job Performance in Malaysia: Conceptual Articulation. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research 2020; 9(4): 3500–3509.

39. Choi TM, Ma C, Shen B, Sun Q. Optimal pricing in mass customization supply chains with risk-averse agents and retail competition. Omega 2019; 88: 150–161. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2018.08.004

40. Liu L, Wang ZH. Research on incentive mechanism of customer knowledge sharing based on the structure of knowledge (Chinese). Chinese Journal of Management Science 2021; 29(8): 241–248. doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.1618

41. He Z, Zhang Z, Yang X. Evolutionary game analysis of knowledge sharing incentive in cloud manufacturing innovation ecosystem (Chinese). Chinese Journal of Management Science 2022; 30(7): 77–87. doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.1465

42. Dufwenberg M, Kirchsteiger G. A theory of sequential reciprocity. Games & Economic Behavior 2004; 47(2): 268–298. doi: 10.1016/j.geb.2003.06.003

43. Chen H, Lu Y, Cong Z, Rui X. System dynamics study on the tacit knowledge sharing between employees and customers of knowledge service enterprise (Chinese). Management Review 2020; 32(2): 127–138.

44. Rabin M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. The American Economic Review 1993; 83(5): 1281–1302.

45. Geanakoplos J, Pearce D, Stacchetti E. Psychological Games and Sequential Rationality. Games & Economic Behavior 1989; 1(1): 60–79. doi: 10.1016/0899-8256(89)90005-5

46. Yin S, Zhao Z. Energy development in rural China towards clean energy system: Utilization status, co-benefit mechanism and countermeasures. Frontiers in Energy Research 2019; 11: 1283407. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2023.1283407

47. Chen J, Zhan Y, Zou X. A sequential reciprocity game model of supply chain finance led by core enterprise (Chinese). Industrial Engineering Journal 2017; 20(3): 106–112, 124. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.e16-3203

48. Biegańska M. Energy Internet-Decentralized systems contributing to reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Autonomous Intelligence 2023; 1078. doi: 10.32629/jai.v7i1.1078

49. Ni Z, Paul S. A multistage game in smart grid security: A reinforcement learning solution. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 2019; 30(9): 2684–2695. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2885530

50. Wang PM, Luo GL. Analysis of user knowledge interaction behavior in virtual academic community from the perspective of subjective game (Chinese). Modern Information 2022; 8: 61–73.

51. Roberts AW. Convex functions. In: Handbook of Convex Geometry. North-Holland; 1993. pp. 1081–1104.

52. Alva S, Manjunath V. Strategy-proof Pareto-improvement. Journal of Economic Theory 2019; 181: 121–142. doi: 10.1016/j.jet.2019.01.004




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v7i2.1044

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Yueyue Song, Yingying Zhang, Yudan Zhao, Shi Yin, Chengli Hu

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/