Company performance analysis based on ISO 9001 compliance using balanced scorecard method in PT. SN Electronics
Abstract
As business competition intensifies, sustainable growth strategies become imperative. With the projected 2030 demand for food and beverages estimated at $194 billion, the need for coolers and freezers rises accordingly. Despite this, PT. SN Electronics faced a 6% sales revenue decline for coolers and freezers in 2020, contrasting with competitors’ growth. Thus, this analysis assesses the company’s performance, particularly its ISO 9001:2015 certification. Our evaluation uses the balanced scorecard method to analyze both financial and non-financial aspects of the company’s performance. The study also examines ISO 9001:2015 compliance and its impact on overall performance. Primary data gathered through interviews and observations involving top management and employees, analyzed with NVivo 12 Plus software. Results indicate strong non-financial performance but underperformance in financial aspects. Nonetheless, the company maintains robust ISO 9001:2015 compliance, positively influencing overall performance. This research underscores the necessity for top management to address financial issues, including price adjustments, while preserving satisfactory non-financial performance. This pioneering research integrates ISO 9001:2015 compliance with the balanced scorecard method, a novel approach. The findings reaffirm ISO 9001:2015’s significant role in enhancing company performance, aligning with its seven management principles.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Abdulwase R, Ahmed F, Nasr F, et al. The role of business strategy to create a competitive advantage in the organization. Open Access Journal of Science 2021; 4(4): 135-138. doi: 10.15406/oajs.2020.04.00162
2. Braun M, Latham S, Cannatelli B. Strategy and business models: why winning companies need both. Journal of Business Strategy 2019; 40(5): 39–45. doi: 10.1108/jbs-01-2019-0005
3. Setiobudi A. The effect of product innovation on interest with satisfaction as mediation. Review of Management and Entrepreneurship 2021; 5(1): 45–58. doi: 10.37715/rme.v5i1.1640
4. Yoshioka-Kobayashi T, Miyanoshita T, Kanama D. Revisiting incremental product innovations in the food-manufacturing industry: An empirical study on the effect of intellectual property rights. Journal of Economic Structures 2020; 9(1). doi: 10.1186/s40008-020-00213-5
5. Kumar K. Cold preservation and processing. In: Food Processing and Preservation. Scientific Publisher; 2020.
6. Coorey R, Ng DSH, Jayamanne VS, et al. The impact of cooling rate on the safety of food products as affected by food containers. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 2018; 17(4): 827–840. Doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12357
7. James C, Onarinde BA, James SJ. The use and performance of household refrigerators: A review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 2017; 16(1): 160–179. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12242
8. Oberman, R., Dobbs, R., Budiman, A., Thompson, F., & Rosse, M. (2012). The archipelago Economy: Unleashing Indonesia’s potential. McKinsey Global Institute, September 2012, 1–116.
9. Kaplan RS. Conceptual foundations of the balanced scorecard. Handbooks of Management Accounting Research 1996; 3: 1253–1269. doi: 10.1016/S1751-3243(07)03003-9
10. Nugraha A, Arif MA, Mubin A. Performance measurement using balanced scorecard and analytical network process methods in lamp manufacturing companies. Journal of Industrial Management and Engineering-Production 2020; 20(2): 33. doi: 10.30587/matrik.v20i2.1039
11. Iyibildiren M, Karasioglu F. Balanced scorecard in business performance measurement and its effect on financial structure. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: C Finance 2018; 18(2): 13–21.
12. Kurniasari V, Memarista G. Analysis of company performance using the balanced scorecard method. Agora 2017; 5(1): 7.
13. Benedek P. Compliance management—A new response to legal and business challenges. Acta Polytechnical Hungarian 2012; 9(3): 135–148.
14. David FR, David FR. Strategic management. In: Pearson Education Limited, 16th ed. Pearson Education; 2017.
15. Sudharmono J. Strategic Management (Indonesian). Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Universitas 2016; 5(1): 1–134.
16. Elbanna S, Al Katheeri B, Colak M. The harder firms practice strategic management, the better they are 1. Strategic Change 2020; 29(5): 561–569. doi: 10.1002/jsc.2365
17. Saif Ul Islam M, Meo MS, Usman M. The relationship between corporate investment decision and firm performance: Moderating role of cash flows. Journal of Public Affairs 2020. doi: 10.1002/pa.2445
18. Taouab O, IssorZ. Firm performance: Definition and measurement models. European Scientific Journal 2019; 15(1): 93–106. doi: 10.19044/esj.2019.v15n1p93
19. Yuanda MK, Sumiyana S. Analysis of company performance measurement using balanced scorecard (Indonesian). Universitas Gadjah Mada; 2018.
20. Lufriansyah L. Balance scorecard in measuring company performance pt pertamina (Indonesian). Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Ekonomi Dan 2020; 4(1): 98–105.
21. Tuan TT. The impact of balanced scorecard on performance: The case of Vietnamese commercial banks. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business 2020; 7(1): 71–79. doi: 10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no1.71
22. Elisabeth DM. Literature review of balanced scorecard advantages and disadvantages of balanced scorecard implementation (Indonesian). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Methodist 2018; 1(2): 96–107.
23. Nour A, Bouqalieh B, Okour S. The impact of institutional governance mechanisms on the dimensions of the efficiency of intellectual capital and the role of the size of the company in the Jordanian Shareholding industrial companies. An-Najah University Journal for Research—B (Humanities) 2022; 36(10): 2181–2212. https://doi.org/10.35552/0247-036-010-006
24. Amer F, Hammoud S, Onchonga D, et al. Assessing patient experience and attitude: BSC-PATIENT development, translation, and psychometric evaluation—A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022; 19(12): 7149. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127149
25. Nour AI, Alamleh LW, Al-Atoot SM, Almomani KM. The effect of applying balanced scorecard on earnings quality among banks listed in Palestine exchange. Cihan University-Erbil Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 2022; 6(1): 101–112. doi: 10.24086/cuejhss.v6n1y2022.pp101-112
26. ISO. International standard ISO 9001: 2015. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/62085.html (accessed on 22 November 2023).
27. Kopia J, Kompalla A, Buchmuller M, Heinemann B. Performance measurement of management system standards using the balanced scorecard. Amfiteatru Economic Journal 2017; 19(11): 981–1002.
28. Toteva P. The conception “Balanced Scorecard”—Tool for strategic management of higher education institutions. International Scientific Journal Innovation 2020; 24(1): 21–24.
29. Nurcahyo R, Zulfadlillah, Habiburrahman M. Relationship between ISO 9001: 2015 and operational and business performance of manufacturing industries in a developing country (Indonesian). Heliyon 2021; 7(1). doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05537
30. Rusjan B, Alič M. Capitalising on ISO 9001 benefits for strategic results. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 2010; 27(7): 756–778. doi: 10.1108/02656711011062372
31. Bakator M, Ćoćkalo D. Improving business performance with ISO 9001: A review of literature and business practice. The European Journal of Applied Economics 2018; 15(1): 83–93. doi: 10.5937/ejae15-16145
32. Schober P, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2018; 126(5): 1763–1768. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864
33. Behnam N, Juanson JBP. ISO 9001 standard and organization’s performance: A literature review. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research 2017; 4(2): 6–13. doi: 10.22192/ijamr.2017.04.02.002
34. Gu Z, Chupradit S, Ku KY, et al. Impact of employees’ workplace environment on employees’ performance: A multi-mediation model. Frontiers in Public Health 2022. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.890400
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v7i4.1171
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Eko Riwayadi, Tri Hesti Murti, Bambang Tri Cahyono, Felina C. Young
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/