Guardians of green: Legal implications and best practices in AI-enabled CSR for environmental sustainability in India
Abstract
This research critically examines the intricate intersection of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), specifically focusing on environmental sustainability. It elucidates the legal implications and optimal practices inherent in their amalgamation. The study underscores the transformative potential for corporations to adopt the “Guardians of Green” role by leveraging AI technologies, such as data analytics, real-time monitoring, and predictive modelling, to enhance the efficacy of environmental stewardship initiatives. A meticulous analysis of the prevailing legal frameworks governing the integration of AI within CSR is conducted, emphasizing compliance paradigms and contemplating potential regulatory advancements that may shape corporate conduct. The paper also delineates best practices for corporations seeking to maximize the environmental impact of their CSR initiatives through the strategic integration of AI, examining its role in optimizing supply chains, improving energy efficiency, and revolutionizing waste management processes. Ethical considerations intrinsic to AI-driven sustainability practices are scrutinized, highlighting the importance of transparent and ethically responsible applications. By amalgamating legal analysis, empirical case studies, and practical insights, this research seeks to provide comprehensive guidance for corporations, policymakers, and legal professionals navigating the evolving landscape of AI-infused CSR for environmental sustainability in India. It establishes a scholarly foundation for future inquiries and discussions on the legal and ethical dimensions underpinning corporate environmental responsibility in the contemporary era of autonomous intelligence.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Mokhtarian E. The Bot Legal Code: Developing a Legally Compliant Artificial Intelligence. Vanderbilt J. Entertain. Technol. Law. 2018; 21(1): 145-208.
2. Kaal WA. Reputation As Capital- How Decentralized Autonomous Organizations Address Shortcomings in the Venture Capital Market. SSRN Electron. J. 2021; 1-25.
3. Marques JC. Industry Business Associations: Self-Interested or Socially Conscious? Journal of Business Ethics. 2016; 143(4): 733-751. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3077-y
4. Goldfarb A, Tucker C. Digital Economics. J. Econ. Lit. 2019; 57(1): 3-43.
5. Bietti E. A Genealogy of Digital Platform Regulation. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2021. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3859487
6. Guggenberger N. Essential Platforms. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2020. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3703361
7. Zimmermann A, Vredenburgh K, Lazar S. The Political Philosophy of Data and AI. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 2022; 52(1): 1-5. doi: 10.1017/can.2022.28
8. Huq AZ. A Right to a Human Decision. Va. Law Rev. 2020; 106(3): 611-688. doi: 10.2307/27074704
9. Chang YL, Ke J. Socially Responsible Artificial Intelligence Empowered People Analytics: A Novel Framework Towards Sustainability. Human Resource Development Review. 2023; 23(1): 88-120. doi: 10.1177/15344843231200930
10. Fox J, North J, Dean J. AI in the boardroom: Could robots soon be running companies? Gov. Dir. 2019; 71(10): 559-564.
11. D’Cruz P, Du S, Noronha E, et al. Technology, Megatrends and Work: Thoughts on the Future of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics. 2022; 180(3): 879-902. doi: 10.1007/s10551-022-05240-9
12. Zovko V. Management in the Year 2050. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems. 2018; 16(3): 417-426. doi: 10.7906/indecs.16.3.14
13. OECD. Algorithms and Collusion: Competition Policy in the Digital Age. Available online: www.oecd.org/competition/algorithms-collusion-competition-policy-in-the-digital-age.htm (accessed on 23.01.2024).
14. Bird E, Fox-Skelly J, Jenner N, et al. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Issues and Initiatives. European Parliamentary Research Service. 2020
15. Kerry CF, Meltzer JP, Renda A, et al. Strengthening International Cooperation on AI. 2021.
16. Gkliatis I, Katsikas E, Koufopoulos D, et al. The Impact of CSR on the Financial Performance of Firms in Different Industries: An Example from the Financial Industry and the Healthcare Industry. European Conference on Management Leadership and Governance. 2023; 19(1): 566-576. doi: 10.34190/ecmlg.19.1.1967
17. Yawar SM, Shaw R. Augmenting Blockchain With Competition Law for a Sustainable Economic Evolution. Frontiers in Blockchain. 2022; 5. doi: 10.3389/fbloc.2022.931246
18. Government of India, Digital Personal Data Protection Act. Available online: https://www.meity.gov.in/writereaddata/files/Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023.pdf (accessed on 23.01.2024).
19. Wewege L, Lee J, Thomsett MC. Disruptions and Digital Banking Trends. J. Appl. Financ. Bank.2020; 10(6): 15-56.
20. Greenstein S. Preserving the rule of law in the era of artificial intelligence (AI). Artificial Intelligence and Law. 2021; 30(3): 291-323. doi: 10.1007/s10506-021-09294-4
21. Ho HY, Tang TK, Cheng YH. Rethinking Corporate Social Responsibility: Thoughts on the Future of Business Ethics. 2023 AMA Summer Academic Conference; 2023. pp. 1098-1100.
22. Du S, Sen S. AI Through a CSR Lens: Consumer Issues and Public Policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. 2023; 42(4): 351-353. doi: 10.1177/07439156231186573
23. Luccioni A, Bengio Y. On the Morality of Artificial Intelligence [Commentary]. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine. 2020; 39(1): 16-25. doi: 10.1109/mts.2020.2967486
24. Manning RA. Emerging Technologies: New Challenges to Global Stability. 2020.
25. Gutierrez CI, Marchant GE, Tournas L. Lessons for Artificial Intelligence from Historical Uses of Soft Law Governance. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2020. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3775271
26. Campbell C, Sands S, Ferraro C, et al. From data to action: How marketers can leverage AI. Business Horizons. 2020; 63(2): 227-243. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2019.12.002
27. Akın Ünver H. Artificial intelligence, authoritarianism and the future of political systems. Available online: Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3331635 (accessed on 23.01.2024).
28. Hinkes AM. The Limits of Code Deference. J. Corp. Law. 2021; 46(4): 869-897.
29. Nkonde M. Is AI Bias a Corporate Social Responsibility Issue? Harv. Bus. Rev. 2019.
30. Toma S. Innovation, a Key Element of Business Models in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Netw. Intell. Stud. 2018; 6(12): 121-130.
31. Veale M, Zuiderveen Borgesius F. Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act—Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach. Computer Law Review International. 2021; 22(4): 97-112. doi: 10.9785/cri-2021-220402
32. Deutscher E. Reshaping Digital Competition: The New Platform Regulations and the Future of Modern Antitrust. The Antitrust Bulletin. 2022; 67(2): 302-340. doi: 10.1177/0003603x221082742
33. Marchant G, Tournas L, Gutierrez CI. Governing Emerging Technologies Through Soft Law: Lessons for Artificial Intelligence. Jurimetrics. 2020; 61(1): 1-18.
34. Bloch-Wehba H. Algorithmic Governance from the Bottom Up. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2022. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4054640
35. Lankoski L, Smith NC. Corporate Responsibility Meets the Digital Economy. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2021. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3845940
36. Di Porto F, Grote T, Volpi G, Invernizzi R. ‘I See Something You Don’t See’: A Computational Analysis of the Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act. Stanford Comput. Antitrust. 2021; 1: 84–116. doi: 10.2763/407537
37. Gürkaynak G, Yılmaz İ, Yeşilaltay B, et al. Intellectual property law and practice in the blockchain realm. Computer Law & Security Review. 2018; 34(4): 847-862. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2018.05.027
38. Ünver HA. Artificial Intelligence, Authoritarianism and the Future of Political Systems. Centre for Economics and Foreign Policy Studies; 2018.
39. Picht PG, Richter H. The Proposed EU Digital Services Regulation 2020: Data Desiderata. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2021. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3925359
40. Li G, Li N, Sethi SP. Does CSR Reduce Idiosyncratic Risk? Roles of Operational Efficiency and AI Innovation. Production and Operations Management. 2021; 30(7): 2027-2045. doi: 10.1111/poms.13483
41. Bhat PI. Impact of Gandhian Thoughts on the Indian Constitutional Jurisprudence. J. Indian Law Inst. 2019; 61(2): 182-212.
42. Arnold D. Nehruvian Science and Postcolonial India. Isis. 2013; 104(2): 360-370. doi: 10.1086/670954
43. Sharma SK, Sarbjeet S, Singh S. Gandhian strategies for democratic decentralisation and development: Dimensions on rural development, Gram Swaraj and Sarvodaya. Indian J. Polit. Sci. 2008; 69(4): 727-744.
44. Maiorano D, Das U, Masiero S. Decentralisation, clientelism and social protection programmes: a study of India’s MGNREGA. Oxford Development Studies. 2018; 46(4): 536-549. doi: 10.1080/13600818.2018.1467391
45. Kumar S. The Concept of State and Democracy in Gandhian Thought. Indian J. Polit. Sci. 2004; 65(3): 377-382.
46. Nandwani B. Decentralisation, Economic Inequality and Insurgency. The Journal of Development Studies. 2018; 55(7): 1379-1397. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2018.1475650
47. Chakrabarty B. Gandhi’s Doctrine of Trusteeship: Spiritualizing Interpersonal Relationship. Bhubaneswar. 2017; 67.
48. Datta M. The Status of Marginalized Women Tea Garden Workers in the Mountain Ecosystem of Darjeeling in a Globalised Village. Perspect. Geogr. Marginality. 2017; 2: 53–70. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-50998-3_5
49. Archana. Trusteeship Model: Redifining Business in the 21st Century. Int. J. Res. Soc. Sci. 2019; 9(11): 1962-1969.
50. Xiao Y. Research on Legal Constraints of Individual Environmental Data Rights and Interests in Big Data Environment. Journal of Environmental and Public Health. 2022; 2022: 1-11. doi: 10.1155/2022/4493267
51. Ghosh A, Banerjee B, Malhotra A, et al. Gearing Up of Corporate Social Responsibility With Artificial Intelligence: An Indian Forecast. ANWESH Int. J. Manag. Inf. Technol. 2019; 4(2): 56-59.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v7i5.1572
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Zubair Ahmed, Naushad Anwar, Amlan De, Rahul Shaw
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/