The use of artificial intelligence in the field of communication: A research on the perspectives of communication academics
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a very important concept in today’s digital communication age. With the development of technology, the use of AI has become widespread in many fields, including the field of communication. This article focuses on the relationship between communication and AI. In this context, the advantages, and disadvantages of using AI in the field of communication were examined. Data obtained from semi-structured in-depth interviews with communication academics were analysed with the content analysis technique. The findings underscore the increasing prevalence of AI usage in the field of communication. Positive aspects such as speed and efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and the ability to analyse large datasets easily were highlighted. However, negative impacts were also identified, including concerns related to privacy and security, the potential lag in emotional intelligence compared to humans, the risk of individuals losing their jobs or harbouring job loss concerns, and the possibility of applications that may not align with ethical principles. As AI continues to evolve in the future, the aim is to address privacy and security concerns, develop applications in alignment with ethical principles, and enhance capabilities to analyse larger datasets while achieving a more advanced emotional intelligence structure.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. McCulloch WS, Pitts W. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics. 1943; 5(4): 115-133. doi: 10.1007/bf02478259
2. Turing AM. Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind. 1950; LIX(236): 433-460. doi: 10.1093/mind/lix.236.433
3. Minsky M, McCarthy J. A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. AI Magazine. 1956; 27(4): 12. doi: 10.1609/aimag.v27i4.1904
4. Dolunay A, Temel AC. The relationship between personal and professional goals and emotional state in academia: a study on unethical use of artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology, 2024; 15: 1363174. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1363174
5. Newell A, Simon H. The logic theory machine--A complex information processing system. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 1956; 2(3): 61-79. doi: 10.1109/tit.1956.1056797
6. Dreyfus HL. What Computers Can’t Do: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence. Harper & Row; 1972.
7. Russell S, Norvig P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 4th ed. Pearson; 2022.
8. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015; 521(7553): 436-444. doi: 10.1038/nature14539
9. Nilsson NJ. Artificial Intelligence: A New Synthesis. Morgan Kaufmann; 2010.
10. Kurzweil R. The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Penguin Books; 2005.
11. Brundage M, Avin S, Clark J, et al. The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation. ArXiv. 2021: arXiv:1802.07228.
12. Bishop MC. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer; 2006.
13. Obermeyer Z, Emanuel EJ. Predicting the Future — Big Data, Machine Learning, and Clinical Medicine. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016; 375(13): 1216-1219. doi: 10.1056/nejmp1606181
14. Khandani AE, Kim AJ, Lo AW. Consumer credit-risk models via machine-learning algorithms. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2013; 37(11): 4183-4193.
15. Rana NP, Dwivedi YK, Williams MD, et al. Investigating success of an e-government initiative: Validation of an integrated IS success model. Information Systems Frontiers. 2014; 17(1): 127-142. doi: 10.1007/s10796-014-9504-7
16. Baker RS. Stupid Tutoring Systems, Intelligent Humans. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2016; 26(2): 600-614. doi: 10.1007/s40593-016-0105-0
17. Ding H, Tian J, Yu W, et al. The Application of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in the Food Industry. Foods. 2023; 12: 4511. doi: 10.3390/ foods1224451
18. Zeba G, Dabić M, Čičak M, et al. Technology mining: Artificial intelligence in manufacturing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2021; 171: 120971. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120971
19. Jurafsky D, Martin JH. Speech and Language Processing. Pearson; 2020.
20. Bughin J, Hazan E, Ramaswamy S, et al. Artificial intelligence: The next digital frontier? McKinsey Global Institute; 2017.
21. Rajpurkar P, Jia R, Liang P. SQuAD-Adversarial: A Reading Comprehension Challenge with Adversarial Questions. arXiv. 2020; arXiv:1801.10585.
22. Rathore B. Revolutionizing the Digital Landscape: Exploring the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Modern Marketing Strategies. Eduzone : international peer reviewed/refereed academic multidisciplinary journal. 2016; 05(02): 08-13. doi: 10.56614/eiprmj.v5i2y16.322
23. Petropoulos G. The impact of artificial intelligence on employment. Praise for Work in the Digital Age. 2018; 119: 121.
24. Diakopoulos N. Algorithmic accountability: A primer. Data Society Research Institute; 2016.
25. Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A. The second Machine Age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. WW Norton & Company; 2014.
26. Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th ed. Sage; 2017.
27. Thomas CG. Research Methodology and Scientific Writing. Springer; 2021.
28. McCracken G. The Long Interview. Sage Publications; 1998.
29. Tekin HH. In-Depth Interview as a Data Collection Technique of Qualitative Research Method. Turkish Journal of Sociology. 2006; 3(13): 101-116.
30. Johshon JM. In-Depth Interviewing. Handbook of Interview Research Context&Method. Sage Publications; 2002.
31. Punch KF. Introduction to Social Research Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Siyasal Publishing; 2005.
32. Miles MB, Huberman AM. An Expanded Sourcebook Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publications; 1994.
33. Biernacki P, Waldorf D. Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling. Sociological Methods & Research. 1981; 10(2): 141-163. doi: 10.1177/004912418101000205
34. Berelson B. Content Analysis in Communication Research. Free Press; 1952.
35. Koçak A, Arun Ö. The Sampling Problem in Content Analysis Studies. Selçuk University Journal of Faculty of Communication. 2006; 3(4): 21-28.
36. Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Sage; 1986.
37. Weber RP. Basic Content Analysis. Sage; 1990.
38. Yıldırım A, Şimşek H. Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Seçkin Publishing; 2008.
39. Karataş Z. Paradigm Transformation in Social Sciences Research: Rise of Qualitative Approach. Turkish Journal of Social Work Research. 2017; 1(1): 68-86.
40. Krishna R, Lee D, Fei-Fei L, et al. Socially situated artificial intelligence enables learning from human interaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2022; 119(39). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2115730119
41. Martı́nez-Miranda J, Aldea A. Emotions in human and artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior. 2005; 21(2): 323-341. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v7i5.1610
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Ayhan Dolunay
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/