banner

Automatic Text Summarization for Urdu Roman Language by Using Fuzzy Logic

zeshan ali

Abstract


 In the new era of technology, there is the redundancy of information in the internet world, which gives a hard time for users to contain the willed outcome it, to crack this hardship we need an automated process that riddle and search the obtained facts. Text summarization is one of the normal methods to solve problems. The target of the single document epitome is to raise the possibilities of data. we have worked mostly on extractive stationed text summarization. Sentence scoring is the method usually used for extractive text summarization. In this paper, we built an Urdu Roman Language Dataset which has thirty thousand articles. We follow the Fuzzy good judgment technique to clear up the hassle of text summarization. The fuzzy logic approach model delivers Fuzzy rules which have uncertain property weight and produce an acceptable outline. Our approach is to use Cosine similarity with Fuzzy logic to suppress the extra data from the summary to boost the proposed work. We used the standard Testing Method for Fuzzy Logic Urdu Roman Text Summarization and then compared our Machine-generated summary with the help of ROUGE and BLEU Score Method. The result shows that the Fuzzy Logic approach is better than the preceding avenue by a meaningful edge.


Keywords


Urdu Roman, Fuzzy Logic, Cosine Similarity, Big Data, Machine Learning.

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. See A, Liu P, Manning C. Get to the point: Summarization with pointer-generator networks. Association for Computational Linguistics 2017.

2. Suanmali L, Salim N, Binwahlan MS. Fuzzy logic based method for improving text summarization. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security 2009; 2(1).

3. Sahba A, Prevost J. Hypercube based clusters in cloud computing. Presented at 11th International Symposium on Intelligent Automation and Control, World Automation Congress 2016, Puerto Rico.

4. Sahba A, Shaba R, Lin WM. Improving IPC in Simultaneous Multi-Threading (SMT) processors

5. by capping IQ utilization according to dispatched memory instructions. Presented at the 2014 World Automation Congress, Waikoloa Village, HI, 2014.

6. Erol BA, Vaishnav S, Labrado JD, et al. Cloud-based control and slam through cooperative mapping and localization. In World Automation Congress (WAC) 2016; IEEE: 1-6.

7. Erol BA, Majumdar A, Lwowski J, et al. Improved deep neural network object tracking system for applications in home robotics. Computational Intelligence for Pattern Recognition. Studies in Computational Intelligence 2018; 777.

8. Amullen EM, Shetty S, Keel LH. Secured formation control for multi-agent systems under DoS attacks. In Technologies for Homeland Security (HST), 2016 IEEE Symposium on 2016; pp: 1-6.

9. Amullen EM, Shetty S, Keel LH. Model-based resilient control for a multi-agent system against Denial of Service attacks. In World Automation Congress (WAC) 2016; pp: 1-6.

10. Farshid Sahba, et al. Wireless sensors and RFID in garden automation. International Journal of Computer and Electronics Research 2014; 3(4).

11. Farshid Sahba, Zahra Nourani. Smart tractors in pistachio orchards equipped with RFID. Presented at the 2016 World Automation Congress 2016.

12. Bouzary H, Frank Chen F. Service optimal selection and composition in cloud manufacturing: A comprehensive survey. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2018.

13. Azgomi HF, Poshtan J. Induction motor stator fault detection via fuzzy logic. Electrical Engineering (ICEE), 2013 21st Iranian Conference on 2013; pp: 1,5,14-16.

14. Azgomi HF, Poshtan J, Poshtan M. Experimental validation on stator fault detection via fuzzy logic. 3rd International Conf on EPECS, Istanbul, 2013.

15. Dabbaghjamanesh M, Kavousi-Fard A, Mehraeen S. Effective scheduling of reconfigurable microgrids with dynamic thermal line rating. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 2018.

16. Rakhshan M, Vafamand N, Shasadeghi M, et al. Design of networked polynomial control systems with random delays: the sum of squares approach. International Journal of Automation and Control 10 2016; (1): 73-86.

17. Shahmaleki P, Mahzoon M, Shahmaleki V. Designing fuzzy controller and real-time experimental studies on a nonholonomic robot. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 2009; 42(15): 312-319.

18. Shahmaleki P, Mahzoon M. Designing a hierarchical fuzzy controller for backing-up a four-wheel autonomous robot. American Control Conference, Seattle, WA 2008; pp: 4893-4897.

19. Barzilay R, Elhadad M. Using lexical chains for text summarization. Proceedings of the Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization Workshop 1997; pp: 10-17.

20. Conroy JM, Oleary DP. Text summarization via hidden markov models. Proceeding of the 24 Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2001; pp: 406-407.

21. Filippova K, Mieskes M, Nastase V, et al. Cascaded filtering for topic-driven multidocument summarization. Proceedings of the Document Understanding Conference 2007; pp: 30-35.

22. Carbonell J, Goldstein J. The use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 1998; pp: 335-336.

23. Cunha I, Fernandez S, Morales PV, et al. A new hybrid summarizer based on vector space model, statistical physics, and linguistics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 2007; pp: 872.

24. Binwahlan MS, Salim N, Suanmali L. Integrating the diversity and swarm-based methods for text summarization. Proceedings of the 5th Postgraduate Annual Research Seminar 2009; pp: 523-527.

25. Fattah MA, Ren F. GA, MR, FFNN, PNN, and GMM based models for automatic text summarization. Comput. Speech-Language 2009; 23: 126-144.

26. Binwahlan MS, Salim N, Suanmali L. Fuzzy swarm-based text summarization. Comput. Sci. 2009; 5: 338-346.

27. Sumit Chopra, Michael Auli, Alexander M Rush. Abstractive sentence summarization with attentive recurrent neural networks. In North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2016.

28. Sho Takase, Jun Suzuki, Naoaki Okazaki, et al. Neural headline generation on abstract meaning representation. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 2016.

29. Jiatao Gu, Zhengdong Lu, Hang Li, et al. Incorporating the copying mechanism in sequence-to-sequence learning. In Association for Computational Linguistics 2016.

30. Yishu Miao, Phil Blunsom. Language as a latent variable: Discrete generative models for sentence compression. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 2016.

31. Ramesh Nallapati, Bowen Zhou, Cicero dos Santos, et al. Abstractive text summarization using sequence-to-sequence RNNs and beyond. In Computational Natural Language Learning 2016.

32. Ramesh Nallapati, Feifei Zhai, Bowen Zhou. SummaRuNNer: A recurrent neural network-based sequence model for extractive summarization of documents. In Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence 2017.

33. Alguliev RM, Aliguliyev RM, Hajirahimova MS, et al. MCMR: Maximum coverage and minimum redundant text summarization model. Expert Systems with Applications 2011; 38(12): 14514-14522.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v3i2.273

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 zeshan ali

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0