Artificial Intelligence and Human Condition: Opposing Entities or Complementary Forces?
Abstract
In the 21st century, artificial intelligence is a force that surpasses artificial intelligence in many aspects, because it has appeared in all fields of social life, from the Internet search engine that determines the taste and preference of obtaining digital information to the intelligent refrigerator that can issue purchase orders to maintain its availability when some food is exhausted. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the ethical, ontological and legal problems that may arise from the wide use of artificial intelligence in today’s society, as a preliminary attempt to solve the problems raised in the title. In terms of methodology, this is a paper prepared using written document sources, such as: literary works, international news articles and arbitration articles published in scientific journals. Its conclusion is that AI may change the lifestyle of the whole civilization in many ways, and even negatively change the human condition by changing human identity and genetic integrity, and weaken people’s leading role in building their own realityd.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Sanz C. What is intelligence? eMS El Mundo del Superdotado; 2021.
2. R. Inteligencia. Qué sabemos y qué nos falta por investigar?(Spanish)[Intelligence. What do we know and what do we need to in-dress?] Rev. Acad. Colomb. Cienc. 2011; 35(134): 97-103.
3. Brito P, Villavicencio C, Sánchez P. Requirements for possible links between artificial intelligence and the future of society. Revista de la Univer-sidad del Zulia 2019; 10(28): 260–280.
4. Stiglitz JE. The price of inequality: The 1% of the population has what the 99% needs. Taurus; 2012.
5. Vinuesa R, Azizpour H, Leite I, et al. The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the sustainable development goals. Nature Communications 2020; 11(1): 1–10.
6. Renz A, Hilbig R. Prerequisites for artificial intel-ligence in further education: Identification of drivers, barriers, and business models of educa-tional technology companies. International Jour-nal of Educational Technology in Higher Educa-tion 2020; 17(1): 1–21.
7. Belk R, Humayun M, Gopaldas A. Artificial Life. Journal of Macromarketing 2020; 40(2): 221–236.
8. Biagini V, Subasic M, Oudalov A, et al. The au-tonomous grid: Automation, intelligence and the future of power systems. Energy Research and Social Science 2020; 65: 122–139.
9. Harari YN. From animals to gods: Brief history of mankind. Debate; 2014
10. Harari YN. Homosexuals: A brief history of to-morrow. Debate; 2015
11. Arbeláez-Campillo DF, Andreyevna Dudareva M, Rojas-Bahamón MJ. In a globalized world, epi-demics are a factor undermining the geopolitical order. Cuestiones Políticas 2019; 36(63): 134–150.
12. Villasmil J. The fragility of human civilization. Cuestiones Políticas 2020; 37(64): 10–14.
13. Martinez M. New science: Challenges, logic and methods. Thrills; 2009.
14. Camproubi CB. Genre theory research. Estudios de Literatura 2014; (05): 101–123.
15. Stephen Hawking: Artificial Intelligence Could Spell End of Human Race [Internet]. BBC News; 2014. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/mundo/ultimas_noticias/2014/12/141202_ultnot_hawking_inteligencia_artificial_riesgo_humanidad_egn
16. Asimov I. Runaround. New York: Street and Smith; 1942.
17. Esparza R. Bilderberg club has launched a new paradigm: Artificial intelligence [Internet]. His-panic; 2015. Available from: https://www.hispanidad.com/confidencial/el-club-bilder-berg-lanza-un-nuevo-paradigma-la-inteligencia-artificial_212299_102.html
18. Savater F. Amado’s morality. Barcelona: Ariel; 1999.
19. Fromm E. Ethics and psychoanalysis. Fondo de Cultura Económica; 2003.
20. Dussel E. Towards critical political philoso-phy-Human rights and development. Bilbao: Desclée; 2001.
21. Morales Castro YR, Villasmil Espinoza J, Mar-tínez Pure RD. Democracy in the spotlight: The people’s government or the degeneration of power? Revista de Ciencias Sociales 2019; 25(1): 236–252.
22. Garrido L, Shanghai J. Less freedom vs. more economic development. Good citizen, force: Chi-na has accelerated its social control plan for 2020 [Internet]. El Condoncial; 2019. Available from: https://www.elconfidencial.com/mundo/2019-09-20/buen-ciudadano-a-la-fuerza-china-acelera-su-plan-de-control-social-para-2020_2201731/.
23. Nietzsche F. Immortal works II Volume 2. Tecnos Editorial, S.A; 2003.
24. Leret MG. Law, biotechnology and bioethics. Ediciones CEC; 2005
25. Calvano L. Political Modernity: Gaze and sign. Revista Cuestiones Politícas 2017; 33(58); 37–48.
26. Calvano L. Social contract and political modernity in Colombia. Fondo Editorial de la Universidad Rafael María Baralt (UNERMB) 2018.
27. Nussbaum M. Creating capabilities: a proposal for human development. Editorial Paidós; 2012.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v4i2.497
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Diego Felipe Arbeláez-Campillo, Jorge Jesús Villasmil Espinoza, Magda Julissa Rojas-Bahamón
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0