banner

Future of urban architectural design based on the concept of smart city

Kaled H. Mudhee

Abstract


Urbanization is an unstoppable global phenomenon, with over half of the world's population now residing in cities. This rapid urban growth presents both opportunities and challenges for architects and city planners. The concept of the smart city has emerged as a promising approach to address these challenges and transform our urban environments into more efficient, sustainable, and livable spaces. Smart cities leverage advanced technologies to enhance various aspects of urban life, including transportation, energy management, healthcare, and public services. The quality of urban architectural design directly determines the city’s development and the people’s quality of life. Today, the concept of a smart city puts strict requirements for urban architectural design. To fully meet the actual needs of social development, it should be reasonably applied to urban architectural design to provide strong support for architectural design. Based on this, this article mainly analyzes the key points and required conditions of urban architectural design under the concept of a smart city, and finally puts forward some effective application countermeasures.


Keywords


smart city; urban; architectural design; design performance

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. Javed AR, Shahzad F, Rehman S, et al. Future smart cities requirements, emerging technologies, applications, challenges, and future aspects. Cities 2022; 129: 103794. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103794

2. Shamsuzzoha A, Nieminen J, Piya S, Rutledge K. Smart city for sustainable environment: A comparison of participatory strategies from Helsinki, Singapore and London. Cities 2021; 114: 103194. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103194

3. Xu R, Yue W, Wei F, et al. Density pattern of functional facilities and its responses to urban development, especially in polycentric cities. Sustainable Cities and Society 2022; 76: 103526. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103526

4. Abdalla AN, Jing W, Nazir MS, et al. Socio-economic impacts of solar energy technologies for sustainable green energy: A review. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2022; 1–38. doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02654-3

5. Yao L, Shah NIM, Mohamad F, et al. What makes courier service creative?—From managing logistics to managing knowledge. Sustainability 2022; 14(21): 14630. doi: 10.3390/su142114630

6. Tahmasbi B, Mansourianfar MH, Haghshenas H, Kim I. Multimodal accessibility-based equity assessment of urban public facilities distribution. Sustainable Cities and Society 2019; 49: 101633. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101633

7. Herslund L, Mguni P. Examining urban water management practices-challenges and possibilities for transitions to sustainable urban water management in Sub-Saharan cities. Sustainable Cities and Society 2019; 48: 101573. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101573

8. Ouafiq EM, Raif M, Chehri A, Saadane R. Data architecture and big data analytics in smart cities. Procedia Computer Science 2022; 207: 4123–4131. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.475

9. Abusaada H, Elshater A. Competitiveness, distinctiveness and singularity in urban design: A systematic review and framework for smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society 2021; 68: 102782. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102782

10. Dana LP, Salamzadeh A, Hadizadeh M, et al. Urban entrepreneurship and sustainable businesses in smart cities: Exploring the role of digital technologies. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship 2022; 1(2): 100016. doi: 10.1016/j.stae.2022.100016

11. Baches MBE. Chapter 26-urban design strategies and the smart city paradigm. Smart Cities Policies and Financing 2022; 365–375. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819130-9.00048-6

12. Enjalbert S, Ribeiro SK, Vanderhaegen F. Concepts and models about smart urban transport control systems for city resilience. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2020; 53(2): 10090–10095. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.2732

13. Yamamoto S. Analysis of smart city reference architecture by ArchiMate. Procedia Computer Science 2022; 207: 514–521. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.106

14. Marchesani F, Masciarelli F, Doan HQ. Innovation in cities a driving force for knowledge flows: Exploring the relationship between high-tech firms, student mobility, and the role of youth entrepreneurship. Cities 2022; 130: 103852. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103852

15. Bhushan B, Khamparia A, Sagayam KM, et al. Blockchain for smart cities: A review of architectures, integration trends and future research directions. Sustainable Cities and Society 2020; 61: 102360. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102360.

16. Westraadt L, Calitz A. A modelling framework for integrated smart city planning and management. Sustainable Cities and Society 2020; 63: 102444. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102444.

17. Ng ST, Xu FJ, Yang Y, Lu M. A master data management solution to unlock the value of big infrastructure data for smart, sustainable and resilient city planning. Procedia Engineering 2017; 196: 939–947. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.034

18. Ivars-Baidal JA, Celdrán-Bernabeu MA, Femenia-Serra F, et al. Smart city and smart destination planning: Examining instruments and perceived impacts in Spain. Cities 2023; 137: 104266. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104266

19. Bastidas V, Reychav I, Helfert M. Design principles for strategic alignment in smart city enterprise architectures (SCEA). Procedia Computer Science 2023; 219: 848–855. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.359




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v7i1.925

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Kaled H. Mudhee

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/