banner

The role of robotics in medical science: Advancements, applications, and future directions

Arun Agrawal, Rishi Soni, Deepak Gupta, Gaurav Dubey

Abstract


This paper explores the role of robotics in medical science, focusing on advancements, applications, and future directions. The rapid evolution of robotics has revolutionized healthcare, particularly in surgical procedures, rehabilitation, and diagnostics. Advancements such as minimally invasive surgery and robot-assisted surgery have improved surgical outcomes by providing enhanced precision and visualization. Tele-robotics enables remote surgeries, bringing specialized care to underserved areas. The integration of AI with robotics has led to the development of intelligent systems capable of analyzing medical data and assisting in decision-making. Robotics finds applications in various domains, including surgery, rehabilitation, diagnosis, imaging, and prosthetics. The future of robotics in medical science holds promising prospects, including nanorobotics, robotic drug delivery, healthcare automation, and human-robot collaboration. Challenges remain, such as ensuring safety and reliability, addressing ethical concerns, and making these technologies accessible. As researchers continue to push boundaries, robotics in medical science is poised to bring significant advancements, improving patient care and outcomes.


Keywords


robotics in medical science; advancements in medical robotics; applications of robotics in healthcare

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. Haleem A, Javaid M, Pratap Singh R, et al. Medical 4.0 technologies for healthcare: Features, capabilities, and applications. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems. 2022, 2: 12-30. doi: 10.1016/j.iotcps.2022.04.001

2. Hartmann F, Baumgartner M, Kaltenbrunner M. Becoming Sustainable, The New Frontier in Soft Robotics. Advanced Materials. 2020, 33(19). doi: 10.1002/adma.202004413

3. Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, et al. Robotic Surgery. Annals of Surgery. 2004, 239(1): 14-21. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000103020.19595.7d

4. Freschi C, Ferrari V, Melfi F, et al. Technical review of the da Vinci surgical telemanipulator. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. 2012, 9(4): 396-406. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1468

5. Lin P, Bekey G, Abney K. Autonomous Military Robotics: Risk, Ethics, and Design. Defense Technical Information Center, 2008. doi: 10.21236/ada534697

6. Froehlich A, Siebrits A, Kotze C. e-Health: How Evolving Space Technology is Driving Remote Healthcare in Support of SDGs. Studies in Space Policy. Published online December 20, 2020: 91-185. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-61780-6_2

7. Davenport T, Kalakota R. The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthcare Journal. 2019, 6(2): 94-98. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94

8. Cianchetti M, Laschi C, Menciassi A, et al. Biomedical applications of soft robotics. Nature Reviews Materials. 2018, 3(6): 143-153. doi: 10.1038/s41578-018-0022-y

9. Javaid M, Haleem A, Singh RP, et al. Utilization of Robotics for Healthcare: A Scoping Review. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management. Published online October 13, 2022. doi: 10.1142/s2424862222500154

10. Abioye SO, Oyedele LO, Akanbi L, et al. Artificial intelligence in the construction industry: A review of present status, opportunities and future challenges. Journal of Building Engineering. 2021, 44: 103299. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103299

11. Bombieri M. Automatic extraction of robotic surgery actions from text and kinematic data. 2023.

12. El Saddik A, Orozco M, Eid M, et al. Haptics Technologies. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-22658-8

13. Vidal FP, Bello F, Brodlie K, et al. Principles and Applications of Medical Virtual Environments. In: Eurographics (State of the Art Reports). 2004.

14. Ghazal TM, Hasan MK, Alshurideh MT, et al. IoT for Smart Cities: Machine Learning Approaches in Smart Healthcare—A Review. Future Internet. 2021, 13(8): 218. doi: 10.3390/fi13080218

15. Okamura A, Mataric M, Christensen H. Medical and Health-Care Robotics. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine. 2010, 17(3): 26-37. doi: 10.1109/mra.2010.937861

16. Habuza T, Navaz AN, Hashim F, et al. AI applications in robotics, diagnostic image analysis and precision medicine: Current limitations, future trends, guidelines on CAD systems for medicine. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked. 2021, 24: 100596. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2021.100596

17. Shiva Kumar HD, Naik RI, Hanamantraygouda MB, et al. Nanorobots scope in the medical field. IJCRT. 2021, 9(6).

18. Nifong LW, Chu VF, Bailey BM, et al. Robotic mitral valve repair: experience with the da Vinci system. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2003, 75(2): 438-443. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04554-x

19. Mohr FW, Falk V, Diegeler A, et al. Computer-enhanced “robotic” cardiac surgery: Experience in 148 patients. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2001, 121(5): 842-853. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2001.112625

20. Van der Loos HFM, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Guglielmelli E. Rehabilitation and Health Care Robotics. Springer Handbooks. Published online 2016: 1685-1728. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1_64

21. Salcudean SE, Moradi H, Black DG, et al. Robot-Assisted Medical Imaging: A Review. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2022, 110(7): 951-967. doi: 10.1109/jproc.2022.3162840

22. Gogia, Shashi, ed. Fundamentals of telemedicine and telehealth. Academic Press, 2019.

23. Vadlapatla R, Wong EY, Gayakwad SG. Electronic drug delivery systems: An overview. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2017, 41: 359-366. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2017.08.008

24. Vercelli A, Rainero I, Ciferri L, et al. Robots in elderly care. DigitCult-Scientific Journal on Digital Cultures. 2018, 2(2): 37-50.

25. Badash I, Burtt K, Solorzano CA, et al. Innovations in surgery simulation: a review of past, current and future techniques. Annals of Translational Medicine. 2016, 4(23): 453-453. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.12.24

26. Li J, Carayon P. Health Care 4.0: A vision for smart and connected health care. IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering. 2021, 11(3), 171-180. doi: 10.1080/24725579.2021.1884627.

27. Chen Y, Chen D, Liang S, et al. Recent Advances in Field‐Controlled Micro–Nano Manipulations and Micro–Nano Robots. Advanced Intelligent Systems. 2021, 4(3). doi: 10.1002/aisy.202100116

28. Cortegoso Valdivia P, Robertson AR, De Boer NKH, et al. An Overview of Robotic Capsules for Drug Delivery to the Gastrointestinal Tract. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021, 10(24): 5791. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245791

29. Iacovacci V, Tamadon I, Kauffmann EF, et al. A fully implantable device for intraperitoneal drug delivery refilled by ingestible capsules. Science Robotics. 2021, 6(57). doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abh3328

30. Ozkil AG, Fan Z, Dawids S, et al. Service robots for hospitals: A case study of transportation tasks in a hospital. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics. Published online August 2009. doi: 10.1109/ical.2009.5262912

31. Ajoudani A, Zanchettin AM, Ivaldi S, et al. Progress and prospects of the human–robot collaboration. Autonomous Robots. 2017, 42(5): 957-975. doi: 10.1007/s10514-017-9677-2




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v7i3.1008

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Arun Agrawal, Rishi Soni, Deepak Gupta, Gaurav Dubey

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/