Cultural communication based on image processing in multimedia network environment
Abstract
In the process of uploading pictures of cultural products under the multimedia network environment, image processing technology is indispensable for page production and picture design, and image processing plays an indispensable role. Purpose: The use of image processing technology enriches the means of cultural communication, and also improves the visual effect and dissemination rate of cultural communication to a certain extent, and produces the effect of deepening people’s hearts. Methods: This paper firstly focuses on the problems and development trends in cultural communication, and uses image processing technology in the multimedia network environment to analyse the effects of cultural communication, and secondly focuses on the application of multimedia network and image processing in cultural communication. Finally, the four-degree evaluation method is used to evaluate the effect of cultural communication. Results: The final results show that with the use of image processing techniques, the rate of cultural dissemination in various cultural fields can reach 50% to 75%. Conclusion: The research on cultural communication based on image processing can deepen the understanding of cultural communication in the multimedia network environment, expand the application of image processing technology in the field of cultural communication, analyse the role and influence of images in cultural communication, and promote the cross-fertilization of cultural communication and image processing, which is of great practical application and academic value.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Lehrner A, Yehuda R. Cultural trauma and epigenetic inheritance. Development and Psychopathology 2018; 30(5): 1763–1777. doi: 10.1017/s0954579418001153
2. Ott DL, Michailova S. Cultural intelligence: A review and new research avenues. International Journal of Management Reviews 2016; 20(1): 99–119. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12118
3. Beugelsdijk S, Welzel C. Dimensions and dynamics of national culture: Synthesizing hofstede with inglehart. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2018; 49(10): 1469–1505. doi: 10.1177/0022022118798505
4. Curtis E, Jones R, Tipene-Leach D, et al. Why cultural safety rather than cultural competency is required to achieve health equity: A literature review and recommended definition. International Journal for Equity in Health 2019; 18(1): 174. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1082-3
5. Nieborg DB, Poell T. The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society 2018; 20(11): 4275–4292. doi: 10.1177/1461444818769694
6. Bekele MK, Pierdicca R, Frontoni E, et al. A survey of augmented, virtual, and mixed reality for cultural heritage. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 2018; 11(2): 7. doi: 10.1145/3145534
7. Mohan A, Poobal S. Crack detection using image processing: A critical review and analysis. Alexandria Engineering Journal 2018; 57(2): 787–798. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2017.01.020
8. Berg S, Kutra D, Kroeger T, et al. ilastik: Interactive machine learning for (bio)image analysis. Nature Methods 2019; 16(12): 1226–1232. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0582-9
9. Li C, Hu M, Li Y, et al. Analogue signal and image processing with large memristor crossbars. Nature Electronics 2017; 1(1): 52–59. doi: 10.1038/s41928-017-0002-z
10. Rizzo S, Botta F, Raimondi S, et al. Radiomics: The facts and the challenges of image analysis. European Radiology Experimental 2018; 2(1): 36. doi: 10.1186/s41747-018-0068-z
11. Radha S, Teja A, Naveen P, et al. Web application for traffic monitoring and guidance. Journal of System and Management Sciences 2020; 10(4): 1–14. doi: 10.33168/JSMS.2020.0403
12. Zwanenburg A, Vallières M, Abdalah MA, et al. The image biomarker standardization initiative: Standardized quantitative radiomics for high-throughput image-based phenotyping. Radiology 2020; 295(2): 328–338. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191145
13. Vagg T, Balta JY, Bolger A, Lone M. Multimedia in education: What do the students think? Health Professions Education 2020; 6(3): 325–333. doi: 10.1016/j.hpe.2020.04.011
14. Khoa BT, Huynh LT, Nguyen MH. The relationship between perceived value and peer engagement in sharing economy: A case study of ridesharing services. Journal of System and Management Sciences 2021; 10(4): 149–172. doi: 10.33168/JSMS.2020.0210
15. Vaganova OI, Bakharev NP, Kulagina JA, et al. Multimedia technologies in vocational education. Amazonia Investiga 2020; 9(26): 391–398. doi: 10.34069/ai/2020.26.02.45
16. Law J, Ong JW, Aziz KA. Leveraging on social entrepreneurship process to safeguard the cultural heritage. Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science 2022; 9(3): 16–30. doi: 10.33168/LISS.2022.0302
17. Syahrial A, Agus Kurniawan D, Chan F, et al. Multimedia innovation 4.0 in education: E-modul ethnoconstructivism. Universal Journal of Educational Research 2019; 7(10): 2098–2107. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2019.071007
18. Rajan N, George A, Saravanan AV, et al. An analysis on customer perception towards Fintech adoption. Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science 2022; 9(3): 146–158. doi: 10.33168/LISS.2022.0311
19. Uktamovna KL. Use of multimedia for the implementation of various methods of learning. Innovative Technologica: Methodical Research Journal 2022; 3(10): 64–69. doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/B3AH5
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v7i1.1195
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Ruolei Chen, Xujia Chen
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/