banner

An investigation to identify the factors that cause failure in English essay, precis, and composition papers in CSS exams

Kiran Gul, Waheed Shahzad, Ali Raza, Essam Hanandeh, Raed Abu Zitar, Khaled Aldiabat, Rabah Shboul, Laith Abualigah

Abstract


The research study aims to examine why candidates in Pakistan failed the English Essay, Precis, and Composition sections of the Central Superior Services (CSS) tests. Those candidates chosen for various civil service positions take the prestigious and difficult CSS exam. The study aims to discover candidates’ difficulties in these particular CSS exam sections and investigate methods for enhancing their English language ability. A mixed-methods strategy is used in the research process to collect both quantitative and qualitative data. Participants in the CSS exam who once took the English Essay, Precis, and Composition papers and got fail in it received a survey form to respond according to their experience. Other than this, we also conducted semi-structured interviews with CSS test winners currently working as officials, such as Deputy Commissioners, Assistant Commissioners, Assistant Superintendents of Police, and Deputy Superintendents of Police. Insights into the causes of failure and the experiences of successful candidates are sought after from both data sources. The research findings highlighted several key factors contributing to failure in English Essays, Precis, and Composition papers. These factors include lack of comprehension and understanding, grammatical errors, inadequate organization, poor handwriting, insufficient practice, lack of originality, difficulty in adapting to essay prompts and precis passages, poor organization, failure to understand and address the purpose, insufficient development of ideas, failure to reach the required word count, grammatical mistakes, neglecting proofreading and revision, poor writing expression, and weak induction and conclusion in essays, tough paper pattern old formatted curriculum. Participants reported struggling to express their ideas coherently, having limited language skills, facing challenges in managing time effectively, lacking proper precis structure understanding, inadequate expertise in the subject, lack of training and resources, lack of analytical and critical thinking abilities, inadequate exam preparation, time management issues, poor grammar abilities, exam phobia, and limited vocabulary as potential factors contributing to failure.


Keywords


survey; CSS exam; English essay; English precis; English composition, errors in essay writing

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. Css exam general information, Available online: https://www.studyandexam.com/css-exam-general-information.html (accessed on 19 July 2023).

2. Montaigne, Michel de, Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Available online: https://iep.utm.edu/montaigne/ (accessed on 19 July 2023).

3. Essay and dissertation writing skills, University of oxford. Available online: https://www.ox.ac.uk/students/ academic/guidance/skills/essay (accessed on 19 July 2023).

4. What is composition? definition, types, and examples. Available online: https://www.thoughtco.com/ what-is-composition-english-1689893 (accessed on 19 July 2023).

5. Composition-definition, meaning & synonyms, vocabulary.com. Available online: https://www.vocabulary.com/ dictionary/composition (accessed on 19 July 2023).

6. Composition definition & meaning-Merriam-webster. Available online: https://www.merriam-webster.com/ dictionary/composition (accessed on 19 July 2023).

7. Precis definition and examples. Available online: https://www.thoughtco.com/precis-definition-1691655 (accessed on 19 July 2023).

8. Mitra BK. Effective technical communication: A guide for scientists and engineers. Oxford Higher Education; 2006.

9. Hanna BT. RUSSEL, Pamela R. (1989): How to Write a Précis, Ottawa, University of Ottawa Press, xiii + 76 p. Meta: Journal des traducteurs. 1993, 38(1): 143. doi: 10.7202/003011ar

10. Precis writing rules for css exams CSS/PMS knowledge hub. Available online: https://csspmscurrentaffairs.com/ precis-writing-rules/ (accessed on 19 July 2023).

11. AlBusaidi S. Language Proficiency and Academic Performance. Springer Texts in Education. Published online 2021: 213-218. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-79143-8_39

12. Zeidner M. Test Anxiety in Educational Contexts. Emotion in Education. Published online 2007: 165-184. doi: 10.1016/b978-012372545-5/50011-3

13. Zimmerman BJ. Attaining Self-Regulation. Handbook of Self-Regulation. Published online 2000: 13-39. doi: 10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50031-7

14. Flower L, Hayes JR. A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. Major Themes in Education; 2004.

15. Daly JA, Wilson DA. Writing Apprehension, Self-Esteem, and Personality. Research in the Teaching of English; 1983. pp. 327–341.

16. Sivaraman A, Al Balushi D. Rao, Understanding Omani students’(university) English language problems. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 2014, 13(1): 28–35.

17. Manihuruk DH. The Correlation between EFL Students’ Vocabulary Knowledge and Reading Comprehension. JET (Journal of English Teaching). 2020, 6(1): 86-95. doi: 10.33541/jet.v6i1.1264

18. Rababah G. Communication problems facing Arab learners of English. Available online: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED473079 (accessed on 19 July 2023).

19. Khaskhely MK, Shamsi AF, Faraz M, Bashir R. Stress mitigation protocol for CSS aspirants. Global Management Journal for Academic & Corporate Studies, 2013, 3(1): 67.

20. CSS exam results-newspaper-dawn.com. Available online: https://www.dawn.com/news/1301118 (accessed on 19 July 2023).

21. Qureshi H, Haidov R. Developing EFL creative writing with the help of collocations an English newspapers corpus perspective. International Journal of Management (IJM), 2020, 11(11): 912–922.

22. Jeremy harmer how to teach writing Longman (2004) — manchen sun-academia.edu. Available online: https://www.academia.edu/41442986/Jeremy_Harmer_How_to_Teach_Writing_Longman_2004_ (accessed on 19 July 2023).

23. Cooze. 100 Ideas for Teaching English. A&C Black; 2006.

24. Shen Y. Reconsidering English Grammar Teaching for Improving Non-English Majors’ English Writing Ability. English Language Teaching. 2012, 5(11). doi: 10.5539/elt.v5n11p74

25. Iqbal MA, Khan MZ, Maryam F. Functional indexes of success in CSS/PMS argumentative essay writing. Inception-Journal of Languages and Literature. 2022, 2(1): 14-25. doi: 10.36755/ijll.v2i1.37

26. Heydari P, Bagheri MS. Error Analysis: Sources of L2 Learners’ Errors. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 2012, 2(8). doi: 10.4304/tpls.2.8.1583-1589

27. Sajid M, Siddiqui JA. Lack of academic writing skills in English language at higher education level in Pakistan: causes, effects and remedies. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2015, 2(4): 174–186.

28. Iqbal Z, Zafran F, Shahzad K, et al. A study of error analysis in written production: a case study of English essays by students of Multan, Pakistan, Pal Arch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 2021, 18(08): 1147–1160.

29. CSS beginners’ guide — Talha Arshad-academia.edu. Available online: https://www.academia.edu/38002814/ CSS_Beginners_Guide (accessed on 19 July 2023).

30. Examiners report 2014. Available online: https://www.fpsc.gov.pk/sites/default/files/Examiners% 20Report%202014.pdf (accessed on 19 July 2023).

31. Ce-2016 examiners reports — federal public service commission. Available online: https://www.fpsc.gov.pk/exams/ css/examiner-report/ce-2016-examiners-reports, (accessed on 19 July 2023).

32. Ce-2017 examiners reports — federal public service commission. Available online: https://www.fpsc.gov.pk/exams/ css/examiner-report/ce-2017-examiners-reports (accessed on 19 July 2023).

33. Ce-2018 examiners reports — federal public service commission. Available online: https://www.fpsc.gov.pk/exams/ css/examiner-report/ce-2018-examiners-reports (accessed on 19 July 2023).

34. Ce-2019 examiners reports — federal public service commission. Available online: https://www.fpsc.gov.pk/exams/ css/examiner-report/ce-2019-examiners-reports (accessed on 19 July 2023).

35. Flower L, Hayes JR. A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication. 1981, 32(4): 365. doi: 10.2307/356600

36. Imtiaz Z, Mahmood MA. Genre analysis of argumentative essays of Pakistani EFL learners. Genre, 2014, 5(30): 95–100.

37. Chinnaiah V, Kiliroor CC. Heterogeneous Feature Analysis on Twitter Data Set for Identification of Spam Messages. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology. Published online January 1, 2022. doi: 10.34028/iajit/19/1/5




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v7i5.1254

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Kiran Gul, Waheed Shahzad, Ali Raza, Essam Hanandeh, Raed Abu Zitar, Khaled Aldiabat, Rabah Shboul, Laith Abualigah

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/