banner

Gender inequality in the sphere of artificial intelligence: Theoretical approach

Khadija Maliki, Fairouz Naji

Abstract


Artificial Intelligence (AI) sector, like the other sectors, is marked by the minority presence of women within these entities. According to the UNESCO, the percentage of technical employees in large enterprises of Machine Learning who are women is 20%, the percentage of researchers in artificial intelligence in the world who are women is 12%, and the percentage of professional software developers who are women is only 6%. In other words, the proportion of gender in the practice of the professions of the AI remains highly unequal. Therefore, it is now crucial to review the causes and consequences of these gender inequalities. This paper aims to develop a theoretical framework for managing human resources in the digital environment and artificial intelligence, aiming to identify the causes and consequences of gender inequality in the AI sector. The study will focus on the role of women in AI. Additionally, it will explore potential solutions to this issue, utilizing an analytical lens grounded in existing literature to gain a deeper understanding of gender disparities in the AI sphere. Nevertheless, this theoretical study has a limitation in its methodology, relying exclusively on a literature review. To better understand the depth of gender inequality within the sector of AI, more empirical case studies are needed for a more comprehensive understanding.


Keywords


women; gender; inequality; artificial intelligence

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. Arbeláez-Campillo DF, Villasmil Espinoza JJ, Rojas-Bahamón MJ. Artificial Intelligence and Human Condition: Opposing Entities or Complementary Forces? Journal of Autonomous Intelligence. 2021, 4(2): 31. doi: 10.32629/jai.v4i2.497

2. Azoulay A. Artificial Intelligence: UNESCO launches Women4Ethical AI expert platform to advance gender equality | UNESCO. Available online: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/artificial-intelligence-unesco-launches-women4ethical-ai-expert-platform-advance-gender-equality (accessed on 17 November 2023).

3. Borgesius FZ. Discrimination, artificial intelligence and algorithmic decisions (French).

4. Bruzzone F, Cavallaro F, Nocera S. The definition of equity in transport. Transportation Research Procedia. 2023, 69: 440-447. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.193

5. CATALYST, & Club des 30 % du Canada. (2020). Les femmes occupant des postes de haute direction au sein des entreprises du S&P/ TSX. Available online: https://www.catalyst.org/fr/research/women-leadership-sp-tsx-french/ (accessed on 17 November 2023).

6. Chen Z. Ethics and discrimination in artificial intelligence-enabled recruitment practices. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2023, 10(1). doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-02079-x

7. Collett C, Dillon S. AI and Gender Four Proposals for Future Research.

8. Council of Europe. Glossary on equality between women and men (French). Égalité de genre et approche intégrée de l’égalité entre les femmes et les hommes—questions de genre—www.coe.int. Questions de genre. Available online: https://www.coe.int/fr/web/gender-matters/gender-equality-and-gender-mainstreaming (accessed on 17 November 2023).

9. Conseil du statut de la femme. Artificial intelligence: Risks for gender equality (French). Available online https://www.csf.gouv.qc.ca/publications (accessed on 17 November 2023).

10. Déclaration de Montréal IA responsable. The Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of Artificial Intelligence (French).

11. Deloitte AI Institute. (2020). Women in AI. Available online: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/deloitte-analytics/us-consulting-women-in-ai.pdf (accessed on 17 November 2023).

12. Française A. Égalité | Dictionnaire de l'Académie française | 9th edition (French). Available online: http://www.dictionnaire-academie.fr/article/A9E0541 (accessed on 17 November 2023).

13. Government of Canada. C. Health Research I. What is gender? What is sex? IRSC (French). Available online: https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/f/48642.html (accessed on 17 November 2023).

14. Government of Canada. Public S. and A. C. Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Terminology Guide-TERMIUM Plus®—Resources from the Language Portal of Canada-Canada.ca (French). Available online: https://www.noslangues-ourlanguages.gc.ca/fr/publications/equite-diversite-inclusion-equity-diversity-inclusion-fra (accessed on 17 November 2023).

15. Government of Canada. C. de recherches en sciences humaines. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (French). Available online: https://www.chairs-chaires.gc.ca/program-programme/equity-equite/best_practices-pratiques_examplaires-fra.aspx (accessed on 17 November 2023).

16. IBM. Women leaders in Artificial Intelligence (French). IBM-France. Available online: https://www.ibm.com/blogs/ibm-france/2021/05/04/les-femmes-leaders-en-intelligence-artificielle/ (accessed on 17 November 2023).

17. IIG. Géoconfluences; École normale supérieure de Lyon. Available online: https://geoconfluences.ens-lyon.fr/glossaire/inegalites-de-genre (accessed on 17 November 2023).

18. Insee. Parity and equality between women and men (French). Available online: https://www.insee.fr/fr/metadonnees/definition/c1296 (accessed on 17 November 2023).

19. Kanter RM. Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women. American Journal of Sociology. 1977, 82(5): 965-990. doi: 10.1086/226425

20. Kramer VW, Konrad AM, Erkut S, Hooper MJ. Critical Mass on Corporate Boards: Why Three or More Women Enhance Governance. Available online: https://theses.hal.science/tel-01526900/document (accessed on 17 November 2023).

21. Laboratoire de l’égalité. Gender bias in artificial intelligence (French).

22. Laboratoire de l’Égalité. The Gender Equal Artificial Intelligence Pact (French).

23. Maghni A, Hamsa I. Logiques de l'égalité (professionnelle) homme-femme au Maroc. Actes du Colloque International Coopération Université - Entreprise: d'une recherche "sur" l'entreprise à une recherche " avec " l'entreprise (French). Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anass_Bakkour/publication/369674373_la_publication_des_Actes_du_Colloque_International_Cooperation_Universite-Entreprise_CUE_organise_a_l'Ecole_Nationale_de_Commerce_et_de_Gestion_de_Tanger_les_25-26_mars_2022_sous_le_theme_D'une_recher/links/64272c3266f8522c38e9499e/la-publication-des-Actes-du-Colloque-International-Cooperation-Universite-Entreprise-CUE-organise-a-lEcole-Nationale-de-Commerce-et-de-Gestion-de-Tanger-les-25-26-mars-2022-sous-le-theme-Dune-rech.pdf#page=127 (accessed on 17 November 2023).

24. Maliki K, Naji F. The Challenges of Women Sports Leaders in Morocco “Theoretical Approach.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Published online June 15, 2023. doi: 10.46254/na8.20230212

25. McKinsey & Company. Women in the Workplace. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/women-in-the-workplace (accessed on 17 November 2023).

26. Naji F. L'égalité professionnelle heurtée au plafond de verre: essai sur une enquête croisée entre la France et le Maroc (French). Available online: https://www.theses.fr/2014PA131019 (accessed on 17 November 2023).

27. Noland M, Moran T, Kotschwar. New Peterson Institute Research on over 21,000 Companies Globally Finds Women in Corporate Leadership Can Significantly Increase Profitability | PIIE. Available online: https://www.piie.com/newsroom/press-releases/new-peterson-institute-research-over-21000-companies-globally-finds-women (accessed on 17 November 2023).

28. OECD. POLITIQUE GENRE DU CILSS. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/fr/csao/donnees-et-dialogue/genre-ouest-afrique/CILSS%20Politique%20Genre%20Revis%C3%A9e%20VF%20mars%202018.pdf (accessed on 17 November 2023).

29. OIT. Inequalities and the world of work (French). Available online: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_792127.pdf (accessed on 17 November 2023).

30. Parviainen J, Coeckelbergh M. The political choreography of the Sophia robot: beyond robot rights and citizenship to political performances for the social robotics market. AI & SOCIETY. 2020, 36(3): 715-724. doi: 10.1007/s00146-020-01104-w

31. Pattam A. Why Women Are Important in AI? Available online: https://www.womenentrepreneurindia.com/viewpoint/leaders-talk/why-women-are-important-in-ai-nwid-2182.html (accessed on 17 November 2023).

32. Pelletier S. The work of Artificial Intelligence: Rapport au travail et coup d'oeil sociodémographique (French).

33. Raul Ramos P. Perspectives and Challenges of AI Techniques in the Field of Social Sciences and Communication.

34. Roopaei M, Horst J, Klaas E, et al. Women in AI: Barriers and Solutions. 2021 IEEE World AI IoT Congress (AIIoT). Published online May 10, 2021. doi: 10.1109/aiiot52608.2021.9454202

35. UNDP. A decade of stagnation: Gender bias is still deeply rooted. Available online: https://www.undp.org/fr/communiques/une-decennie-de-stagnation-les-prejuges-sexistes-sont-toujours-bien-enracines (accessed on 17 November 2023).

36. UNESCO. UNESCO CULTURE FOR DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS.

37. UNESCO. Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Available online: https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics (accessed on 17 November 2023).

38. UNESCO, OECD, & IDB. The effects of AI on women's working lives (French). Available online: https://wp.oecd.ai/app/uploads/2022/03/FRENCH-The-Effects-of-AI-on-the-Working-Lives-of-Women.pdf (accessed on 17 November 2023).

39. UQAM. Equity, diversity, inclusion. Equity, diversity, inclusion (French). Available online: https://edi.uqam.ca/lexique/diversite/ (accessed on 17 November 2023).

40. World Economic Forum. Golbal Gender Gap Report. Available online: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2023.pdf (accessed on 17 November 2023).

41. Young E, Wajcman J, Laila S. Where are the women? Mapping the Gender Job Gap in AI. Policy Briefing: Full Report. The Alan Turing Institute; 2021.

42. Zaidman C. Co-education, a way of arranging gender relations (French). Les cahiers du CEDREF. 2007, (15): 95-122. doi: 10.4000/cedref.373




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v7i3.1394

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Khadija Maliki, Fairouz Naji

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/