The quality traits of artificial intelligence operations in predicting mental healthcare professionals’ perceptions: A case study in the psychotherapy division
Abstract
As advancements in healthcare technologies continue to emerge, the integration of AI-Technology has brought about significant transformations in various healthcare sectors. While substantial advancements have been made in applying AI to enhance physical health, its implementation in the field of mental health is still in its early stages. This descriptive study aims to address this gap by exploring the perspectives of mental health professionals (MHPs) on the acceptance and utilization of AI technology. Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) was utilized to assess MHPs’ attitudes and beliefs towards AI implementation in psychotherapeutic practices. The sample was compromised of 349 MHPs. The findings reveal the task characteristic (TC) domain as the most influential domain, followed by Performance expectancy (PE), Behavioural intentions (BI), Personal innovativeness in IT (PT), Social influence (SI), Effort expectancy (EE), Perceived substitution crisis (PSC), Technology characteristic (TECH), and Initial trust (IT). The study also identifies statistically significant differences in AI usage based on gender variable, with females demonstrating a higher level of AI usage in comparison to males. Furthermore, the study highlights diverse applications of AI in the field of mental health, including AI-assisted assessments (AAA), chatbots for psychotherapy support (CPS), and data analytics for personalized treatment recommendations (DAPTR). By incorporating mental healthcare professionals’ (MHPs) perspectives, this research significantly contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the acceptance and utilization of AI technology in psychotherapy. The findings offer valuable insights into MHPs’ perceptions, concerns, and perceived advantages associated with integrating AI technology within clinical settings in the field of mental health.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Aburayya A, Al Marzouqi AM, Salloum SA, Alawadhi DAM. The impact of the covid-19 pandemic on the mental health status of healthcare providers in the primary health care sector in Dubai. Linguistica Antverpiensia. 2021, 21(2): 2995-3015.
2. Putri AK, Yahya ANF, Saputra AR. Indonesian Faculty Barriers in Providing Help to College Students in Distress. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice. 2019, 23(4): 929-944. doi: 10.1177/1521025119880821.
3. Salloum S, Al Marzouqi A, Alderbashi KY, et al. Sustainability Model for the Continuous Intention to Use Metaverse Technology in Higher Education: A Case Study from Oman. Sustainability. 2023, 15(6): 5257. doi: 10.3390/su15065257.
4. Negash A, Khan MA, Medhin G, et al. Mental distress, perceived need, and barriers to receive professional mental health care among university students in Ethiopia. BMC Psychiatry. 2020, 20(1). doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02602-3.
5. Ali SH, Agyapong VIO. Barriers to mental health service utilisation in Sudan perspectives of carers and psychiatrists. Ali SH, Agyapong VIO. Barriers to mental health service utilisation in Sudan - perspectives of carers and psychiatrists. BMC Health Services Research. 2015, 16(1). doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1280-2.
6. Gulliver A, Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Perceived barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking in young people: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2010, 10(1). doi: 10.1186/1471-244x-10-113
7. Wainberg ML, Scorza P, Shultz JM, et al. Challenges and Opportunities in Global Mental Health: a Research-to-Practice Perspective. Current Psychiatry Reports. 2017, 19(5). doi: 10.1007/s11920-017-0780-z
8. Bruen AJ, Wall A, Haines-Delmont A, et al. Exploring Suicidal Ideation Using an Innovative Mobile App-Strength Within Me: The Usability and Acceptability of Setting up a Trial Involving Mobile Technology and Mental Health Service Users. JMIR Mental Health. 2020, 7(9): e18407. doi: 10.2196/18407.
9. Thieme A, Belgrave D, Doherty G. Machine Learning in Mental Health. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 2020, 27(5): 1-53. doi: 10.1145/3398069.
10. Tennant RD. Supporting Caregivers in Complex Home Care: Towards Designing a Voice User Interface [Master’s thesis]. University of Waterloo, 2021. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10012/16963 (accessed on 2 June 2023).
11. Aburayya A, Alawadhi D, Taryam M. A conceptual framework for implementing TQM in the primary healthcare centers and examining its impact on patient satisfaction. International Journal of Advanced Research. 2019, 7(3): 1047-1065. doi: 10.21474/IJAR01/8735.
12. Capuyan DL, Capuno R, Suson R, Malabago NK. Adaptation of Innovative Edge Banding Trimmer for Technology Instruction: A University Case. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues. 2021, 13(1): 31-41. doi: 10.18844/wjet.v13i1.5361.
13. Aburayya A, Al Marzouqi AM, Al Ayadeh I, et al. Evolving a hybrid appointment system for patient scheduling in primary healthcare centres in Dubai: Perceptions of patients and healthcare provider. International Journal on Emerging Technologies. 2020, 11(2): 251-260.
14. Shwedeh F, Aburayya A, Alfaisal R, et al. SMEs’ Innovativeness and Technology Adoption as Downsizing Strategies during COVID-19: The Moderating Role of Financial Sustainability in the Tourism Industry Using Structural Equation Modelling. Sustainability. 2022, 14(23): 16044. doi: 10.3390/su142316044.
15. Webster CS. Artificial intelligence and the adoption of new technology in medical education. Medical Education. 2020, 55(1): 6-7. doi: 10.1111/medu.14409.
16. Crigger E, Reinbold K, Hanson C, et al. Trustworthy Augmented Intelligence in Health Care. Journal of Medical Systems. 2022, 46(2). doi: 10.1007/s10916-021-01790-z.
17. Miotto R, Wang F, Wang S, et al. Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2017, 19(6): 1236-1246. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx044.
18. Quaak M, van de Mortel L, Thomas RM, et al. Deep learning applications for the classification of psychiatric disorders using neuroimaging data: Systematic review and meta-analysis. NeuroImage: Clinical. 2021, 30: 102584. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102584.
19. Aburayya A, Salloum SA, Alderbashi KY, et al. SEM-machine learning-based model for perusing the adoption of metaverse in higher education in UAE. International Journal of Data and Network Science. 2023, 7(2): 667-676. doi: 10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.3.005.
20. Chekroud AM, Bondar J, Delgadillo J, et al. The promise of machine learning in predicting treatment outcomes in psychiatry. World Psychiatry. 2021, 20(2): 154-170. doi: 10.1002/wps.20882.
21. Mohr DC, Zhang M, Schueller SM. Personal Sensing: Understanding Mental Health Using Ubiquitous Sensors and Machine Learning. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2017, 13(1): 23-47. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-044949.
22. Rebelo AD, Verboom DE, dos Santos NR, et al. The impact of artificial intelligence on the tasks of mental healthcare workers: A scoping review. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans. 2023, 1(2): 100008. doi: 10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100008.
23. Salloum SA, Shwedeh F, Alfaisal AM, et al. Understanding and Forecasting Chatbot Adoption: An SEM-ANN Methodology. Migration Letters. 2023, 20(S11): 652-668.
24. Alsharhan A, Salloum SA, Aburayya A. Technology acceptance drivers for AR smart glasses in the middle east: A quantitative study. International Journal of Data and Network Science. 2022, 6(1): 193-208. doi: 10.5267/j.ijdns.2021.9.008.
25. Higgins O, Short BL, Chalup SK, et al. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) based decision support systems in mental health: An integrative review. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 2023, 32(4): 966-978. doi: 10.1111/inm.13114.
26. Paganini S, Teigelkötter W, Buntrock C, et al. Economic evaluations of internet- and mobile-based interventions for the treatment and prevention of depression: A systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2018, 225: 733-755. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.018.
27. Barak A, Hen L, Boniel-Nissim M, et al. A Comprehensive Review and a Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Internet-Based Psychotherapeutic Interventions. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 2008, 26(2-4): 109-160. doi: 10.1080/15228830802094429.
28. Chen Z, Liu X, Yang Q, et al. Evaluation of Risk of Bias in Neuroimaging-Based Artificial Intelligence Models for Psychiatric Diagnosis. JAMA Network Open. 2023, 6(3): e231671. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1671.
29. Shwedeh F, Hami N, Abu Bakar, et al. The Relationship between Technology Readiness and Smart City Performance in Dubai. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology. 2022, 29(1): 1-12. doi: 10.37934/araset.29.1.112.
30. El Nokiti A, Shaalan K, Salloum S, et al. Is Blockchain the answer? A qualitative Study on how Blockchain Technology Could be used in the Education Sector to Improve the Quality of Education Services and the Overall Student Experience. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems. 2022, 28(11): 543-556.
31. Butler AC, Chapman JE, Forman EM, et al. The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Clinical Psychology Review. 2006, 26(1): 17-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.003.
32. Dobson KS. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of cognitive therapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1989, 57(3): 414-419. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.57.3.414.
33. Shwedeh FF. The impact of smart city policy timeliness and technology readiness on smart city performance in dubai: the moderating effect of financial availability. etd.uum.edu.my; Publisher; 2021.
34. So M, Yamaguchi S, Hashimoto S, et al. Is computerised CBT really helpful for adult depression?-A meta-analytic re-evaluation of CCBT for adult depression in terms of clinical implementation and methodological validity. BMC Psychiatry. 2013, 13(1). doi: 10.1186/1471-244x-13-113.
35. Wright JH, Owen JJ, Richards D, et al. Computer-Assisted Cognitive-Behavior Therapy for Depression. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2019, 80(2). doi: 10.4088/jcp.18r12188.
36. Sachan D. Self-help robots drive blues away. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2018, 5(7): 547. doi: 10.1016/s2215-0366(18)30230-x.
37. Murphy M, Templin J. Replika. replika.ai. Available online: https://replika.com/ (accessed on 2 June 2023).
38. Shwedeh F, Hami N, Abu Bakar S. Dubai smart city and residence happiness: A conceptual study. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology. 2021, 25(1): 7214–7222.
39. Shwedeh F, Aburayya A, Mansour M. The Impact of Organizational Digital Transformation on Employee Performance: A Study in the UAE. Migration Letters. 2023, 20(S10): 1260-1274.
40. Pang Z, Yuan H, Zhang YT, Packirisamy M. Guest Editorial: Health Engineering Driven by the Industry 4.0 for Aging Society. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics. 2018, 22(6): 1709-1710.
41. Schwab, Klaus. The fourth industrial revolution. Currency, 2017.
42. Almarzouqi A, Aburayya A, Salloum SA. Determinants predicting the electronic medical record adoption in healthcare: A SEM-Artificial Neural Network approach. Haldorai A, ed. PLOS ONE. 2022, 17(8): e0272735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272735.
43. McCarthy J. Artificial Intelligence, Logic and Formalizing Common Sense. Philosophical Logic and Artificial Intelligence. Published online 1989: 161-190. doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-2448-2_6
44. Aburayya A, Salloum SA, Alderbashi KY, et al. SEM-machine learning-based model for perusing the adoption of metaverse in higher education in UAE. International Journal of Data and Network Science. 2023, 7(2): 667-676. doi: 10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.3.005.
45. Graham S, Depp C, Lee EE, et al. Artificial Intelligence for Mental Health and Mental Illnesses: an Overview. Current Psychiatry Reports. 2019, 21(11). doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1094-0.
46. Shwedeh F, Malaka S, Rwashdeh B. The Moderation Effect of Artificial Intelligent Hackers on the Relationship between Cyber Security Conducts and the Sustainability of Software Protection: A Comprehensive Review. Migration Letters. 2023, 20(S9): 1066-1072.
47. Shwedeh F, Hami N, Baker SZA. Effect of leadership style on policy timeliness and performance of smart city in Dubai: A review. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management.2021, pp. 917-922.
48. Alkashami M, Taamneh AM, Khadragy S, et al. AI different approaches and ANFIS data mining: A novel approach to predicting early employment readiness in middle eastern nations. International Journal of Data and Network Science. 2023, 7(3): 1267-1282. doi: 10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.4.011.
49. Comito C, Falcone D, Forestiero A. Current Trends and Practices in Smart Health Monitoring and Clinical Decision Support. 2020. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM). Published online December 16, 2020. doi: 10.1109/bibm49941.2020.9313449.
50. Brinker TJ, Hekler A, Hauschild A, et al. Comparing artificial intelligence algorithms to 157 German dermatologists: the melanoma classification benchmark. European Journal of Cancer. 2019, 111: 30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.12.016.
51. Vidal-Alaball J, Royo Fibla D, Zapata MA, et al. Artificial Intelligence for the Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Primary Care: Protocol for Algorithm Development. JMIR Research Protocols. 2019, 8(2): e12539. doi: 10.2196/12539.
52. Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke and Vascular Neurology. 2017, 2(4): 230-243. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000101.
53. Miller DD, Brown EW. Artificial Intelligence in Medical Practice: The Question to the Answer? The American Journal of Medicine. 2018, 131(2): 129-133. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.10.035.
54. Shwedeh F, Adelaja AA, Ogbolu G, et al. Entrepreneurial innovation among international students in the UAE: Differential role of entrepreneurial education using SEM analysis. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies. 2023, 6(2): 266-280. doi: 10.53894/ijirss.v6i2.1328.
55. Bickman L. Improving Mental Health Services: A 50-Year Journey from Randomized Experiments to Artificial Intelligence and Precision Mental Health. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2020, 47(5): 795-843. doi: 10.1007/s10488-020-01065-8.
56. Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine. 2019, 25(1): 44-56. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7.
57. Shwedeh F, Aldabbagh T, Aburayya A, et al. The Impact of Harnessing Total Quality Management Studies on the Performance of Smart Applications: A study in Public and Private Sectors in the UAE. Migration Letters. 2023, 20(S12): 83-108. doi: 10.59670/ml.v20is12.5843.
58. Janssen RJ, Mourão-Miranda J, Schnack HG. Making Individual Prognoses in Psychiatry Using Neuroimaging and Machine Learning. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging. 2018, 3(9): 798-808. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.04.004.
59. Lee JC. The perils of artificial intelligence in healthcare: Disease diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Research. 2019, 9(1): 1–6. doi: 10.5897/JCBBR2019.0122.
60. Jeon Y, Kang J, Kim BC, et al. Early Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis Using Wearable Sensors and Multilevel Gait Assessment: A Machine Learning Ensemble Approach. IEEE Sensors Journal. 2023, 23(9): 10041-10053. doi: 10.1109/jsen.2023.3259034.
61. Dahu BM, Aburayya A, Shameem B, et al. The Impact of COVID-19 Lockdowns on Air Quality: A Systematic Review Study. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health. Published online January 24, 2023. doi: 10.56801/seejph.vi.312.
62. Shwedeh F. Harnessing digital issue in adopting metaverse technology in higher education institutions: Evidence from the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Data and Network Science. 2024, 8(1): 489-504. doi: 10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.9.007.
63. Vimalkumar M, Sharma SK, Singh JB, et al. ‘Okay google, what about my privacy?’: User’s privacy perceptions and acceptance of voice based digital assistants. Computers in Human Behavior. 2021, 120: 106763. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106763.
64. Shatte ABR, Hutchinson DM, Teague SJ. Machine learning in mental health: a scoping review of methods and applications. Psychological Medicine. 2019, 49(09): 1426-1448. doi: 10.1017/s0033291719000151.
65. Wang Y, Kung L, Byrd TA. Big data analytics: Understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2018, 126: 3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.019.
66. Bangerter A, Chatterjee M, Manfredonia J, et al. Automated recognition of spontaneous facial expression in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: parsing response variability. Molecular Autism. 2020, 11(1). doi: 10.1186/s13229-020-00327-4.
67. Taryam, Manal, et al. "Factors affecting the uptake of COVID-19 vaccine among dubai airport's professionals." South Eastern European Journal of Public Health. 2022, Special issue 5: 1-14. DOI: 10.11576/seejph-5091.
68. Le Glaz A, Haralambous Y, Kim-Dufor DH, et al. Machine learning and natural language processing in mental health: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2019, 23: e15708.
69. Ravikumar A, Kitana A, Taamneh A, et al. Impact of knowledge sharing on knowledge Acquisition among Higher Education Employees. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems. 2022, 28(12): 827-845.
70. Ravikumar R, Kitana A, Taamneh A, et al. The Impact of Big Data Quality Analytics on Knowledge Management in Healthcare Institutions: Lessons Learned from Big Data’s Application within The Healthcare Sector. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health. Published online January 24, 2023. doi: 10.56801/seejph.vi.309.
71. Khadragy S, Elshaeer M, Mouzaek T, et al. Predicting Diabetes in United Arab Emirates Healthcare: Artificial Intelligence and Data Mining Case Study. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health. 2022. Special Issue 5, 1-14. doi.org/10.56801/seejph.vi.406.
72. Fitzpatrick KK, Darcy A, Vierhile M. Delivering Cognitive Behavior Therapy to Young Adults with Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using a Fully Automated Conversational Agent (Woebot): A Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mental Health. 2017, 4(2): e19. doi: 10.2196/mental.7785.
73. Jasri A, Aljasmi S, Aburayya A, et al. Employing PLS-SEM Analysis to Examine the Mediation Role of Artificial Intelligence in Physician Experience. An Empirical Study of the Effect of the Medical Smartwatch on Physician Satisfaction. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health, July 2022, doi:10.56801/seejph.vi.407.
74. Salloum SA, Shwedeh F, Alfaisal AM, et al. Understanding and Forecasting Chatbot Adoption: An SEM-ANN Methodology. Migration Letters. 2023, 20(S11): 652-668.
75. Alaboud K, Toubal IE, Dahu BM, et al. The Quality Application of Deep Learning in Clinical Outcome Predictions Using Electronic Health Record Data: A Systematic Review. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health. 2023, 21: 9-23. Available online: https://www.seejph.com/index.php/seejph/article/view/427 (accessed on 2 June 2023).
76. Deng W, Hu D, Xu S, et al. The efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy for PTSD symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2019, 257: 698-709. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.07.086.
77. Kothgassner OD, Goreis A, Kafka JX, et al. Virtual reality exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD): A meta-analysis. European journal of psychotraumatology. 2019, 10(1): 1654782.
78. Liu L, Zhao S, Chen H, et al. A new machine learning method for identifying Alzheimer’s disease. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory. 2020, 99: 102023. doi: 10.1016/j.simpat.2019.102023.
79. Hornstein S, Forman-Hoffman V, Nazander A, et al. Predicting therapy outcome in a digital mental health intervention for depression and anxiety: A machine learning approach. Digital Health. 2021, 7: 205520762110606. doi: 10.1177/20552076211060659.
80. Bernert RA, Hilberg AM, Melia R, et al. Artificial Intelligence and Suicide Prevention: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Investigations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020, 17(16): 5929. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165929.
81. Berrouiguet S, Billot R, Larsen ME, et al. An Approach for Data Mining of Electronic Health Record Data for Suicide Risk Management: Database Analysis for Clinical Decision Support. JMIR Mental Health. 2019, 6(5): e9766. doi: 10.2196/mental.9766.
82. Hollis V, Pekurovsky A, Wu E, et al. On Being Told How We Feel. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies. 2018, 2(3): 1-31. doi: 10.1145/3264924.
83. Sano Taylor S, McHill AW, Phillips AJ, et al. Identifying Objective Physiological Markers and Modifiable Behaviors for Self-Reported Stress and Mental Health Status Using Wearable Sensors and Mobile Phones: Observational Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2018, 20(6): e210. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9410.
84. Garcia-Ceja E, Osmani V, Mayora O. Automatic Stress Detection in Working Environments from Smartphones’ Accelerometer Data: A First Step. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics. 2016, 20(4): 1053-1060. doi: 10.1109/jbhi.2015.2446195.
85. Maxhuni A, Muñoz-Meléndez A, Osmani V, et al. Classification of bipolar disorder episodes based on analysis of voice and motor activity of patients. Pervasive and Mobile Computing. 2016, 31: 50-66. doi: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2016.01.008.
86. Zenonos A, Khan A, Kalogridis G, et al. HealthyOffice: Mood recognition at work using smartphones and wearable sensors. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PerCom Workshops). Published online March 2016. doi: 10.1109/percomw.2016.7457166.
87. Lu H, Frauendorfer D, Rabbi M, et al. StressSense. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. Published online September 5, 2012. doi: 10.1145/2370216.2370270.
88. Garcia-Ceja E, Osmani V, Mayora O. Automatic Stress Detection in Working Environments from Smartphones’ Accelerometer Data: A First Step. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics. 2016, 20(4): 1053-1060. doi: 10.1109/jbhi.2015.2446195.
89. Furukawa TA, Suganuma A, Ostinelli EG, et al. Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2021, 8(6): 500-511. doi: 10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00077-8.
90. Josephine K, Josefine L, Philipp D, et al. Internet- and mobile-based depression interventions for people with diagnosed depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2017, 223: 28-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.021.
91. Donker T, Blankers M, Hedman E, et al. Economic evaluations of Internet interventions for mental health: a systematic review. Psychological Medicine. 2015, 45(16): 3357-3376. doi: 10.1017/s0033291715001427.
92. Davis FD. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989, 13(3): 319. doi: 10.2307/249008.
93. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quaterly. 2003, 27: 425–478.
94. Constantiou ID, Lehrer C, Hess T. Changing information retrieval behaviours: an empirical investigation of users’ cognitive processes in the choice of location-based services. European Journal of Information Systems. 2014, 23(5): 513-528. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2014.12.
95. Salameh M, Taamneh A, Kitana A, et al. The Impact of Project Management Office’s Role on Knowledge Management: A Systematic Review Study. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems. 2022, 28(12): 846-863.
96. Tarhini A, Arachchilage NAG, Masa’deh R, et al. A Critical Review of Theories and Models of Technology Adoption and Acceptance in Information System Research. International Journal of Technology Diffusion. 2015, 6(4): 58-77. doi: 10.4018/ijtd.2015100104.
97. Chekroud AM, Bondar J, Delgadillo J, et al. The promise of machine learning in predicting treatment outcomes in psychiatry. World Psychiatry. 2021, 20(2): 154-170. doi: 10.1002/wps.20882.
98. Abousamra R, Alfaisal R, Alhumaid K, et al. Predicting the Intention to Use Google Glass in the Educational Projects: A Hybrid SEM-ML Approach. Academy of Strategic Management Journal. 2022, 21: 1-13.
99. Abdallah S, Al Azzam B, El Nokiti A, et al. A COVID19 Quality Prediction Model based on IBM Watson Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Experiment. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems. 2022, 28(11): 499-518.
100. Abdallah S, Al Azzam B, El Nokiti AS, et al. A COVID19 Quality Prediction Model based on IBM Watson Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Experiment. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems. 2022, 28(11): 499-518.
101. Waehama, Wanamina, et al. ICT Adoption and the UTAUT Model. Proceedings of the international conference on educational technology with information technology; 2014.
102. Tran AQ, Nguyen LH, Nguyen HSA, et al. Determinants of Intention to Use Artificial Intelligence-Based Diagnosis Support System Among Prospective Physicians. Frontiers in Public Health. 2021, 9: 755644. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.755644.
103. Bohr A, Memarzadeh K. The rise of artificial intelligence in healthcare applications. Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare. Published online 2020: 25-60. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-818438-7.00002-2.
104. McKnight DH. Trust in Information Technology. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management. Oxford: Blackwell; 2005. pp. 329–331.
105. Kalinić Z, Marinković V, Djordjevic A, et al. What drives customer satisfaction and word of mouth in mobile commerce services? A UTAUT2-based analytical approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 2019, 33(1): 71-94. doi: 10.1108/jeim-05-2019-0136.
106. Kessler SK, Martin M. How do potential users perceive the adoption of new technologies within the field of artificial intelligence and internet- of-things? A revision of the UTAUT 2 model using voice assistant [Master’s thesis]. University of Lund, Lund (Sweden); 2017.
107. Malarvizhi CA, Al Mamun A, Jayashree S, et al. Predicting the Intention and Adoption of Near Field Communication Mobile Payment. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022, 13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.870793.
108. Aljasmi, Shaima, et al. The Impact of Hospital Demographic Factors on Total Quality Management Implementation: A Case Study of UAE Hospitals. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health. (2022), Special Issue 5, 1-13. doi: 10.11576/seejph-5758.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v7i4.1438
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Shirin Abdallah Alimour, Emad Alnono, Shaima Aljasmi, Hani El Farran, Abdellateef Abdelhafez Alqawasmi, Mohamed Mahmoud Alrabeei, Fanar Shwedeh, Ahmad Aburayya
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/