Examining school leaders’ perceptions of school readiness for data-driven leadership in the UAE: A mixed-methods approach
Abstract
A growing demand for data-driven leadership (DDL) has emerged in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Despite the use of implementation frameworks to guide DDL implementation, there is a lack of application of this concept in the context of UAE schools. This study aims to evaluate the readiness of public schools in the Western region, specifically cycle two and three, for DDL implementation. Using an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design based on the active implementation framework (AIF) drivers, the researcher conducted a qualitative scoping review of sixty-three literature sources and a quantitative survey of sixteen school principals from nineteen schools, selected through simple random sampling. Descriptive analysis and thematic analysis were performed to analyze the collected data. Findings suggest that organizational drivers receive greater emphasis in DDL readiness compared to competency drivers among school principals. However, the overall readiness for DDL remains uncertain, with ratings for this driver falling between the highest and middle-scoring categories. The school principals have identified competency, organizational, and technical leadership as essential drivers for successful DDL implementation in their schools. Further research is recommended to examine the role of adaptive leadership in DDL implementation. Overall, this study offers valuable insights into DDL implementation in Western region public schools and underscores the significance of AIF drivers in achieving successful DDL implementation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Mandinach EB. Data-Driven Decision Making in Education. Data-Driven Decision Making in Education. Published online May 30, 2022. doi: 10.4324/9781138609877-ree3-1
2. Jones L, Kennedy E. A Guide to Data-Driven Leadership in Modern Schools. In: Google Books. IAP. 2015.
3. Uding R. What is Data-Driven Leadership? Argon & Co. 2022.
4. Koltay T. Data governance, data literacy and the management of data quality. IFLA Journal, 2016; 42(4), 303–312. doi: 10.1177/0340035216672238
5. Barton J. Development and Initial Validation of a Measure for Early Childhood Program Readiness for Data Driven Decision Making. 2019.
6. Marsh JA, Farrell CC. How leaders can support teachers with data-driven decision making. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 2014; 43(2): 269-289. doi: 10.1177/1741143214537229
7. Coulton S, Clift S, Skingley A, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of community singing on mental health-related quality of life of older people: Randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2015; 207(3): 250-255. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.129908
8. Madden J. Developing the conditions for data driven change to impact student achievement and build teacher capacity. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences. 2019; 5(2): 542-560. doi: 10.20319/pijss.2019.52.542560
9. Litz D, Smith A, Hourani RB. The School Inspection and Evaluation (SSE-Irtiqaa) Process in Abu Dhabi: A Case-Study in Data-Driven Leadership and Management. Available online: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/210044/ (accessed on 8 November 2022).
10. Alzuhair D. Managing and Guiding School Reform: A review of strategies adopted by selective international schools in the UAE towards reform. Available online: https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/1335 (accessed on 26 January 2023).
11. Albers B, Mildon R, Lyon AR, et al. Implementation frameworks in child, youth and family services – Results from a scoping review. Children and Youth Services Review. 2017; 81: 101-116. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.07.003
12. Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implementation Science. 2013; 8(1). doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-139
13. Malecki L. Implementation Science: What Is It and Why Is It Crucial in Health Care? The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania. 2021.
14. Fixsen DL, Blase KA, Naoom SF, et al. Core Implementation Components. Research on Social Work Practice. 2009; 19(5): 531-540. doi: 10.1177/1049731509335549
15. Metz A, Bartley L. Active Implementation Frameworks for Program Success: How to Use Implementation Science to Improve Outcomes for Children. Zero to Three (J). 2012; 32(4): 11-18.
16. Moullin JC, Sabater-Hernández D, Fernandez-Llimos F, et al. A systematic review of implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare and resulting generic implementation framework. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2015; 13(1). doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0005-z
17. Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation Science. 2015; 10(1). doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0
18. Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers DA, et al. Bridging Research and Practice. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2012; 43(3): 337-350. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024
19. Metz A, Albers B. What Does It Take? How Federal Initiatives Can Support the Implementation of Evidence-Based Programs to Improve Outcomes for Adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2014; 54(3), S92–S96. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.11.025
20. Fixsen D, Blase K, Naoom S, et al. Assessment drivers best practices. 2015.
21. Metz A, Bartley L, Ball H, et al. Active Implementation Frameworks for Successful Service Delivery. Research on Social Work Practice. 2014; 25(4): 415-422. doi: 10.1177/1049731514543667
22. Goodwin LD. Changing Conceptions of Measurement Validity: An Update on the New Standards. Journal of Nursing Education. 2002; 41(3): 100-106. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-20020301-05
23. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage; 2018.
24. Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, et al. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. 2020. doi: 10.46658/jbimes-20-12
25. Dworkin SL. Sample Size Policy for Qualitative Studies Using In-Depth Interviews. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2012; 41(6), 1319–1320. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-0016-6
26. Clarke V, Braun V. Thematic Analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2016; 12(3), 297–298. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
27. Starnes DS, Yates DS, Moore DS. The practice of statistics. New York: W.H. Freeman. 2012.
28. Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1970; 30(3): 607-610. doi: 10.1177/001316447003000308
29. Barton JL, Akin BA. Implementation Drivers as Practical Measures of Data-Driven Decision-Making: An Initial Validation Study in Early Childhood Programs. Global Implementation Research and Applications. 2022; 2(2): 141-152. doi: 10.1007/s43477-022-00044-5
30. Carpenter S. Ten Steps in Scale Development and Reporting: A Guide for Researchers. Communication Methods and Measures. 2017; 12(1): 25-44. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2017.1396583
31. Hinkin TR, Tracey JB, Enz CA. Scale Construction: Developing Reliable and Valid Measurement Instruments. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research. 1997; 21(1): 100-120. doi: 10.1177/109634809702100108
32. Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill. 1978
33. Konting MM, Kamaruddin N, Man NA. Quality Assurance in Higher Education Institutions: Exist Survey among Universiti Putra Malaysia Graduating Students. International Education Studies. 2009; 2(1). doi: 10.5539/ies.v2n1p25
34. Foran AR. Assessing Teacher Data Use: A Validation Study of the Teacher Data Use Survey (TDUS) - ProQuest. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/openview/67b326174c19db2c729a832cd2d7d2b1/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y (accessed 28 December 2023).
35. Nilsen P, Bernhardsson S. Context matters in implementation science: a scoping review of determinant frameworks that describe contextual determinants for implementation outcomes. BMC Health Services Research, 2019; 19(1). doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4015-3
36. Wigham B. An Examination of Oregon Department of Education’s Implementation Processes and Practices. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/edd/137/ (accessed 28 December 2023).
37. Willermark S. Understanding the meaning of digitally competent leadership in schools: a review of research. In: TED 2021 Proceedings, 978-84-09-27666-0, 3095–3103. doi: 10.21125/inted.2021.0655
38. Dogan E, Demirbolat AO. Data-Driven Decision-Making in Schools Scale: A Study of Validity and Reliability. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 2021; 13(1), 507–523.
39. Husabo E, Haugland BSM, Wergeland GJ, Maeland S. Providers’ Experiences with Delivering School-Based Targeted Prevention for Adolescents with Anxiety Symptoms: A Qualitative Study. School Mental Health. 2020. doi: 10.1007/s12310-020-09382-x
40. Sharma A. Advancing Results through Leadership Development Reflections on Technical Assistance for the Promise Neighborhoods Program. Available online: https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/103289/advancing-results-through-leadership-development_3.pdf (accessed on 24 January 2024).
41. Weeks A. Important Factors for Evidence-Based Implementation in Child Welfare Settings: A Systematic Review. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 2020; 1–26. doi: 10.1080/26408066.2020.1807433
42. DiClemente CC, Schlundt D, Gemmell L. Readiness and Stages of Change in Addiction Treatment. American Journal on Addictions, 2004; 13(2), 103–119. doi: 10.1080/10550490490435777
43. Zweig J, Irwin C, Kook J, Cox J. In collaboration with the Early Childhood Education Research Alliance. Available online: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED555737.pdf (accessed on 24 January 2024).
44. Guerrero EG, Frimpong J, Kong Y, et al. Advancing theory on the multilevel role of leadership in the implementation of evidence-based health care practices. Health Care Management Review. 2020; 45(2): 151-161. doi: 10.1097/hmr.0000000000000213
45. Lyons O, Timmons J, Cohen-Hall A, et al. The essential characteristics of successful organizational transformation: Findings from a Delphi panel of experts. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation. 2018; 49(2): 205-216. doi: 10.3233/jvr-180966
46. Coulton S, Clift S, Skingley A, Rodriguez J. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of community singing on mental health-related quality of life of older people: Randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 2015; 207(3), 250–255. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.129908
47. Dill KA, Shera W. Empowering Human Services Organizations to Embrace Evidence-Informed Practice: International Best Practices. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance. 2015; 39(4): 323-338. doi: 10.1080/23303131.2015.1050141
48. Yazejian N, Bryant D. Embedded, Collaborative, Comprehensive: One Model of Data Utilization. Early Education & Development. 2013; 24(1): 68-70. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2013.736128
49. Hamash M, Mohamed H, Ghreir H. Effectively Promoting Data-Driven Leadership Among Education Leaders. The International Conference on Education (ICE 2022). 2022.
50. Weiner BJ. A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science. 2009; 4(1). doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-67
51. Ogden T, Bjørnebekk G, Kjøbli J, et al. Measurement of implementation components ten years after a nationwide introduction of empirically supported programs – a pilot study. Implementation Science. 2012; 7(1). doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-49
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v7i5.1547
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Mahmoud Hamash, Hanan Ghreir, Hasnah Mohamed
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/