Challenges and solutions of Artificial Intelligence-based fault location methods in power system lines
Abstract
The accurate and efficient location of faults in power system lines is crucial for ensuring reliable and uninterrupted power supply. In recent years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been increasingly used in fault location methods, promising to improve the accuracy and efficiency of fault location. However, AI-based fault location methods also face challenges such as data quality, interpretability, and model robustness. Review method: This paper presents a review of the challenges and solutions of AI-based fault location methods in power system lines. The review is based on a comprehensive analysis of existing literature and research studies, focusing on the challenges associated with AI-based fault location methods and the solutions proposed to address these challenges. Content: The paper discusses the challenges associated with AI-based fault location methods in power system lines, including data quality, interpretability, and model robustness. The review presents several solutions to address these challenges, including data preprocessing techniques to improve data quality, explainable AI methods to enhance interpretability, and robustness validation techniques to improve model robustness. The accurate and efficient location of faults in power system lines is crucial for ensuring reliable and uninterrupted power supply. AI-based fault location methods have the potential to improve the accuracy and efficiency of fault location. However, these methods also face challenges such as data quality, interpretability, and model robustness. Addressing these challenges through techniques such as data preprocessing, explainable AI, and robustness validation can help to improve the accuracy and reliability of AI-based fault location methods.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Shafiullah M, Abido M, AI-Mohammed AH. Fault diagnosis in two-terminal power transmission lines. In: Power System Fault Diagnosis. Elsevier; 2022. pp. 159–194.
2. Bahmanyar A, Jamali S, Estebsari A, Bompard E. A comparison framework for distribution system outage and fault location methods. Electric Power Systems Research 2017; 145: 19–34. doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2016.12.018
3. Kongar I, Giovinazzi S, Rossetto T. Seismic performance of buried electrical cables: Evidence-based repair rates and fragility functions. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2017; 15(7): 3151–3181. doi: 10.1007/s10518-016-0077-3
4. Rashag HF, Koh SP, Abdalla AN, et al. Improved close loop stator flux estimation of direct torque control drive. Procedia Engineering 2012; 38: 572–577. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.071
5. Jaber AS, Ahmad AZ, Abdalla AN. A new parameters identification of single area power system based LFC using Segmentation Particle Swarm Optimization (SePSO) algorithm. In: Proceedings of 2013 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference; 8–11 December 2013; Hong Kong, China.
6. Hussein BM, Jaber AS. Unit commitment based on modified firefly algorithm. Measurement and Control 2020; 53(3–4): 320–327. doi: 10.1177/0020294019890630
7. Mohammad KS, Jaber AS. Comparison of electric motors used in electric vehicle propulsion system. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 2022; 27(1): 11. doi: 10.11591/ijeecs.v27.i1.pp11-19
8. Jaber AS, Satar KA, Shalash NA. Short term load forecasting for electrical dispatcher of Baghdad city based on SVM-PSO method. In: Proceedings of 2018 2nd International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics: Toward the Most Efficient Way of Making and Dealing with Future Electrical Power System and Big Data Analysis; 16–17 October 2018; Batam, Indonesia. pp. 140–143.
9. Izzri N, Mehdi OH, Abdalla AN, et al. Fast prediction of power transfer stability index based on radial basis function neural network. International Journal of the Physical Sciences 2011; 6(35): 7978–7984. doi: 10.5897/IJPS11.1322
10. Jaber AS, Satar KA, Shalash NA. Short-term load forecasting for electrical dispatcher of Baghdad city based on SVM-FA. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 2018; 9(11): 300–304. doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2018.091141
11. Azrag MAK, Kadir TAA, Kabir MN, Jaber AS. Large-scale kinetic parameters estimation of metabolic model of Escherichia Coli. International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing 2019; 9(2): 160–167. doi: 10.18178/ijmlc.2019.9.2.781
12. Alhayani F, Jaber AS, Aydin C, Atilla DC. Tuning of PID controller for Four-Area load frequency control using elephant herding optimization. AURUM Mühendislik Sistemleri ve Mimarlık Dergisi 2020; 3(2): 215–225.
13. Gajbhiye S, Karmore SP. Cable fault monitoring and indication: A review. International Journal of Computer Science and Network 2013; 2(4): 20–24. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1309.5457
14. Gururajapathy SS, Mokhlis H, Illias HA. Fault location and detection techniques in power distribution systems with distributed generation: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017; 74(C): 949–958. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.021
15. Chen K, Huang C, He J. Fault detection, classification and location for transmission lines and distribution systems: A review on the methods. High Voltage 2016; 1(1): 25–33. doi: 10.1049/hve.2016.0005
16. Mane V, Mansawale P, Yawale S, Deshmukh A. Cable fault detection methods: A review. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management 2022; 5(6): 314–317.
17. Niazy I, Sadeh J. A new single ended fault location algorithm for combined transmission line considering fault clearing transients without using line parameters. Electrical Power and Energy Systems 2013; 44(1): 816–823. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.08.007
18. Lee H, Mousa AM. GPS travelling wave fault locator systems: Investigation into the anomalous measurements related to lightning strikes. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 1996; 11(3): 1214–1223. doi: 10.1109/61.517474
19. Bao JZ, Zhong T, Ye M. A fault location and realization method for overhead high voltage power transmission. Procedia Engineering 2011; 15: 964–968. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.08.178
20. McKinnon C, Gargoom A, Rabbani M, Oo A. Detection of high impedance faults on compensated distribution networks. In: Proceedings of 2019 29th Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference; 26–29 November 2019; Nadi, Fiji.
21. Dash DK, Biswal T, Swain SC. Optimum relaying scheme of high impedance fault detection in Micro-Grid. In: Proceedings of 2020 National Conference on Emerging Trends on Sustainable Technology and Engineering Applications; 7–8 February 2020; Durgapur, India.
22. Chen J, Li H, Deng C, Wang G. Detection of single-phase to ground faults in low-resistance grounded MV systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 2020; 36(3): 1499–1508. doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2020.3010165
23. Sun J, Zhang L, Chen M, et al. Feeder selection method of single-phase high impedance grounding fault in SRGS. In: Proceedings of 2021 6th International Conference on Smart Grid and Electrical Automation; 29–30 May 2021; Kunming, China. pp. 112–116.
24. Liu B, Ma H, Xu H, Ju P. Single-phase-to-ground fault detection with distributed parameters analysis in non-direct grounded systems. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems 2019; 5(1): 139–147. doi: 10.17775/CSEEJPES.2016.00740
25. Jaber AS, Ahmad AZB, Abdalla AN. Advance two-area load frequency control using Particle Swarm Optimization scaled fuzzy logic. Advanced Materials Research 2013; 622–623: 80–85. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.622-623.80
26. Jaber AS, Ahmad AZ, Abdalla AN. An investigation of Scaled-FLC using PSO for multi-area power system load frequency control. Energy and Power Engineering 2013; 5(4): 458–462. doi: 10.4236/epe.2013.54B088
27. Jaber AS, Abdulbari HA, Shalash NA, Abdalla AN. Garra Rufa-inspired optimization technique. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 2020; 35(11): 1831–1856. doi: 10.1002/int.22274
28. Verma VK, Kumar M, Patel K, et al. Underground cable fault detection using IoT. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology 2020; 7(7): 3145–3151.
29. Wang Z, Xu L. Fault detection of the power system based on the chaotic neural network and wavelet transform. Complexity 2020; 2020: 1–15. doi: 10.1155/2020/8884786
30. Jin Q, Ju R. Fault location for distribution network based on genetic algorithm and stage treatment. In: Proceedings of 2012 Spring Congress on Engineering and Technology; 27–30 May 2012; Xi’an, China. pp. 1–4.
31. Li Y, Zhang S, Li H, et al. A fault location method based on genetic algorithm for high-voltage direct current transmission line. European Transactions on Electrical Power 2012; 22(6): 866–878. doi: 10.1002/etep.1659
32. Adhikari S, Sinha N, Dorendrajit T. Fuzzy logic based on-line fault detection and classification in transmission line. SpringerPlus 2016; 5(1): 1002. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2669-4
33. Gururajapathy SS, Mokhlis H, Illias HA. Fault location using mathematical analysis and database approach. Compel: International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering 2019; 38(1): 415–430. doi: 10.1108/COMPEL-02-2018-0077
34. Jaber A, Ahmad AZ, Abdalla AN. A new load frequency controller based on parallelization of fuzzy PD with conventional PI (FPD-PI). Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 2014; 373–379.
35. Azrag MAK, Kadir TAA, Jaber AS. Segment Particle Swarm Optimization adoption for Large-Scale kinetic parameter identification of Escherichia Coli metabolic network model. IEEE Access 2018; 6: 78622–78639. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2885118
36. Bedekar PP, Bhide SR, Kale VS. Fault section estimation in power system using Hebb’s rule and continuous genetic algorithm. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 2011; 33(3): 457–465. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.10.008
37. Qin X, Zhang Y, Mei W, et al. A cable fault recognition method based on a deep belief network. Computers & Electrical Engineering 2018; 71: 452–464. doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2018.07.043
38. Nakho A, Hamam Y. Detection and classification of single phase to ground faults under high resistance ground paths in power systems using machine learning. In: Proceedings of 2021 Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference/Robotics and Mechatronics/Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa; 27–29 January 2021; Potchefstroom, South Africa.
39. Ekici S. Support Vector Machines for classification and locating faults on transmission lines. Applied Soft Computing 2012; 12(6): 1650–1658. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2012.02.011
40. Deng X, Yuan R, Xiao Z, et al. Fault location in loop distribution network using SVM technology. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 2015; 65: 254–261. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.10.010
41. Ray P, Mishra DP. Support Vector Machine based fault classification and location of a long transmission line. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal 2016; 19(3): 1368–1380. doi: 10.1016/j.jestch.2016.04.001
42. Jaber AS, Mohammad KS, Shalash NA. Optimization of electrical power systems using hybrid PSO-GA computational algorithm: A review. International Review of Electrical Engineering 2020; 15(6): 502–511. doi: 10.15866/iree.v15i6.18599
43. Shalash NA, Ahmad AZ, Jaber AS. Multi-agent approach to reliability assessment of power system generation using fuzzy logic. International Journal of Simulation: Systems, Science & Technology 2016; 17(32): 1–18. doi: 10.5013/IJSSST.a.17.32.18
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v6i2.642
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Azad Hussein Zubair, Kamal Sheikh Younis
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0