banner

Energy consumption structure model considering urban green and low-carbon transportation

Kaled H. Mudhee

Abstract


The importance of energy conservation and emission reduction has become the consensus of the international community, and Iraq is also actively improving the urban public transportation system to control carbon emissions. This paper collects panel data of Tikrit city in Iraq in the past 3 years, constructs a random effect variable coefficient model, and studies the impact of the development of urban low-carbon transportation system on the energy consumption structure. The study finds that the government can use public transportation pricing strategies to influence consumers. In order to realize the optimization of energy consumption structure, the impact of electric vehicles on energy consumption structure will decrease with the increase of urban development. The transportation sector can increase the purchase and travel costs of traditional cars by restricting travel, purchases, and charging parking fees, which affects the number of private cars and reduces the obstacles to optimizing the energy consumption structure. The government should increase financial subsidies, improve rail transit and reasonable bus (electric) vehicle operation systems, increase investment in new energy vehicle research and development, and encourage high energy density and low power consumption technologies. development, increase residents’ demand for new energy passenger vehicles, and optimize the energy consumption structure.


Keywords


low-carbon transportation system; energy consumption structure; public transportation; new energy vehicles

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. Shazed AR, Ashraf HM, Katebah MA, et al. Overcoming the energy and environmental issues of LNG plants by using solid oxide fuel cells. Energy 2021; 218: 119510. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119510

2. Xing H, Stuart C, Spence S, Chen H. Alternative fuel options for low carbon maritime transportation: Pathways to 2050. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021; 297: 126651. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126651

3. Fisch-Romito V, Guivarch C. Transportation infrastructures in a low carbon world: An evaluation of investment needs and their determinants. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2019; 72: 203–219. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.04.014

4. Zhang Y, Xu D. The bus is arriving: Population growth and public transportation ridership in rural America. Journal of Rural Studies 2022; 95: 467–474. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.09.018

5. Gorji MA, Shetab-Boushehri SN, Akbarzadeh M. Developing public transportation resilience against the epidemic through government tax policies: A game-theoretic approach. Transport Policy 2022; 128: 229–239. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.09.013

6. Brough R, Freedman M, Phillips DC. Experimental evidence on the effects of means-tested public transportation subsidies on travel behavior. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2022; 96: 103803. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2022.103803

7. Baig F, Zhang D, Lee J, Xu H. Shaping inclusiveness of a transportation system: Factors affecting seat-yielding behavior of university students in public transportation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2022; 155: 79–94. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.11.004

8. Buehler R. Can public transportation compete with automated and connected cars?. Journal of Public Transportation 2018; 21(1): 7–18. doi: 10.5038/2375-0901.21.1.2

9. Tabti-Talamali A, Baouni T. Public transportation in Algiers: Towards a new governance approach. Case Studies on Transport Policy 2018; 6(4): 706–715. doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2018.08.009

10. Psaltoglou A, Calle E. Enhanced connectivity index—A new measure for identifying critical points in urban public transportation networks. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection 2018; 21: 22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcip.2018.02.003

11. Bartłomiejczyk M, Kołacz R. The reduction of auxiliaries power demand: The challenge for electromobility in public transportation. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020; 252: 119776. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119776

12. Motienko A. Integration of information and communication system for public health data collection and intelligent transportation system in large city. Transportation Research Procedia 2020; 50: 466–472. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2020.10.055

13. Errampalli M, Patil KS, Prasad CSRK. Evaluation of integration between public transportation modes by developing sustainability index for Indian cities. Case Studies on Transport Policy 2020; 8(1): 180–187. doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2018.09.005




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v6i2.879

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Kaled H. Mudhee

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0