banner
Home > Open Journal Systems

Design and application of performance evaluation model of school education informatization based on artificial intelligence mode

Zhongyin Zhao, Ng Giap Weng, Sabariah Bte Sharif

Abstract


Educational informationization is an important part of educational reform. The performance evaluation of educational informationization plays an important role in promoting the development of informationization. Therefore, a performance evaluation model of school education informatization based on artificial intelligence mode is put forward. First, the current situation of school education informatization evaluation is briefly described, summarizing the artificial intelligence technology. The evaluation model of education informatization based on artificial intelligence is established, the performance evaluation index of school education informatization analyzed in detail. The index meets the requirement of input data through quantification and normalization, and the process of performance evaluation is designed. Feasibility and stability of the evaluation method are confirmed by the performance evaluation of school education informatization and the error analysis of the test results.


Keywords


education informatization; artificial intelligence; neural network; performance evaluation

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. Zhou J. The research on the higher education informatization and the digitalization campus construction. Manufacturing Automation 2011; 30(1): 60–105.

2. Sysoyev PV. Directions of linguistic education informatization. Anaesthesia 2015; 51(12): 1186. doi: 10.17223/24109266/5/8

3. Hu S, Zhang J. Cost-benefit factors analysis based on principal component in education informatization. Advances in Information Sciences & Service Sciences 2012; 4(17): 365–372.

4. Kim JM, Lee WG. An analysis of educational informatization level of students, teachers, and parents: In Korea. Computers & Education 2011; 56(3): 760–768. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.018

5. Toguchi T. Fujitsu education solution k-12 school business support services for elementary and junior high schools. Fujitsu Scientific & Technical Journal 2015; 51(1): 9–14.

6. Mingaleva Z, Stegniy V, Chernovalova G. Information technologies in distance learning in higher education in Russia. CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology 2013; 62(1): 207–210.

7. Nourani V, Özgür Kisi, Komasi M. Two hybrid artificial intelligence approaches for modeling rainfall-runoff process. Journal of Hydrology 2011; 402(1): 41–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.002

8. Bennett CC, Hauser K. Artificial intelligence framework for simulating clinical decision-making: A Markov decision process approach. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 2013; 57(1): 9–19. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2012.12.003

9. Davis E, Marcus G. Commonsense reasoning and commonsense knowledge in artificial intelligence. Communications of the ACM 2015; 58(9): 92–103. doi: 10.1145/2701413

10. Hovy E, Navigli R, Ponzetto SP. Collaboratively built semi-structured content and artificial intelligence: The story so far. Artificial Intelligence 2013; 194(1): 2–27. doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2012.10.002

11. Ramchurn SD, Vytelingum P, Rogers A, et al. Putting the ‘smarts’ into the smart grid: A grand challenge for artificial intelligence. Communications of the ACM 2012; 55(4): 86–97. doi: 10.1145/2133806.2133825

12. Serenko A, Dohan M. Comparing the expert survey and citation impact journal ranking methods: Example from the field of artificial intelligence. Journal of Informetrics 2011; 5(4): 629–648. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2011.06.002

13. Islam T, Rico-Ramirez MA, Han D, Srivastava PK. Artificial intelligence techniques for clutter identification with polarimetric radar signatures. Atmospheric Research 2012; 109(110): 95–113. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.02.007

14. Mandal P, Madhira STS, Haque AU, et al. Forecasting power output of solar photovoltaic system using wavelet transform and artificial intelligence techniques. Procedia Computer Science 2012; 12(1): 332–337. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2012.09.080

15. Moravčík M, Schmid M, Burch N, et al. DeepStack: Expert-level artificial intelligence in heads-up no-limit poker. Science 2017; 356(6337): 508. doi: 10.1126/science.aam6960

16. Shahbaz K, Baroutian S, Mjalli FS, et al. Densities of ammonium and phosphonium based deep eutectic solvents: Prediction using artificial intelligence and group contribution techniques. Thermochimica Acta 2012; 527(2): 59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2011.10.010

17. Zăvoianu AC, Bramerdorfer G, Lughofer E, et al. Hybridization of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms and artificial neural networks for optimizing the performance of electrical drives. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 2013; 26(8): 1781–1794. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2013.06.002

18. Yaghini M, Shadmani MA. Gofam: A hybrid neural network classifier combining fuzzy ARTMAP and genetic algorithm. Artificial Intelligence Review 2013; 39(3): 183–193. doi: 10.1007/s10462-011-9265-3

19. Sattari MT, Yurekli K, Pal M. Performance evaluation of artificial neural network approaches in forecasting reservoir inflow. Applied Mathematical Modelling 2012; 36(6): 2649–2657. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2011.09.048

20. Pan WT, Huang CE, Chiu CL. Study on the performance evaluation of online teaching using the quantile regression analysis and artificial neural network. Journal of Supercomputing 2016; 72(3): 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s11227-015-1599-1




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v7i1.906

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Zhongyin Zhao, Ng Giap Weng, Sabariah Bte Sharif

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/