banner
Home > Open Journal Systems

The intelligence between the influence of AR technical ideological and political courses on the different characteristics of college students

Zhongyin Zhao, Ng Giap Weng, Sabariah Bte Sharif

Abstract


In the contemporary educational ecosystem, Augmented Reality (AR) technology is marking its prominence across diverse disciplines globally, and China has been an active adopter. By integrating AR, educators, especially those handling ideological and political courses, can elevate their teaching methodologies, rendering them more interactive and engaging. For instance, traditionally static textbook content can be transformed into interactive elements, allowing students a tactile experience, while intricate theoretical constructs can be elucidated through dynamic video demonstrations. Such immersive approaches not only enhance comprehension but also significantly boost students’ enthusiasm and classroom involvement. Beyond mere content delivery, AR opens up avenues for innovative classroom exercises and evaluations. Within the framework of ideological and political courses, students, by leveraging AR, can simulate real-world scenarios, ensuring that knowledge transcends theory and is solidified through practical application. The essence of our research underscores the pivotal role of AR in rejuvenating pedagogical strategies, fostering improved learning outcomes, and ensuring a holistic understanding of intricate ideological and political concepts.


Keywords


five major personalities; AR learning system; ideological and political learning analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. Yue HE. Research on the application of new media technology in ideological and political education in colleges and universities. Journal of Educational Institute of Jilin Province 2018.

2. Watson JB. Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review 1913; 20(2): 158–177.

3. Oiaget J. The stages of the intellectual development of the child. Educational Psychology in Context: Readings for Future Teachers 1965; 98–106.

4. Jonassen DH. Thinking technology: Toward a constructivist design model. Educational Technology 1994; 34(4): 34–37.

5. Martínez IM, Youssef-Morgan CM, Chambel MJ, Marques-Pinto A. Antecedents of academic performance of university students: Academic engagement and psychological capital resources. Educational Psychology 2019; 39(8): 1047–1067. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2019.1623382

6. Jia J. The application of virtual reality technology in the practical teaching of civic and political science courses in colleges and universities. New Curriculum Research (Zhonglun Journal) 2018; (3): 41G43.

7. El Sayed NAM, Zayed HH, Sharawy M I. ARSC: Augmented reality student card An augmented reality solution for the education field. Computers & Education 2011; 56(4): 1045–1061. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.019

8. Li Y, Mao H. Study on machine learning applications in ideological and political education under the background of big data. Scientific Programming 2022; 2022: 3317876. doi: 10.1155/2022/3317876

9. Kaufmann H, Schmalstieg D. Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality. Computers & Graphics 2003; 27(3): 339–345. doi: 10.1016/S0097-8493(03)00028-1

10. Klopfer E, Squire K. Environmental detectives—the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development 2008; 56(2): 203–228. doi: 10.1007/s11423-007-9037-6

11. Dunlevy M, Dede C, Mitchell R. Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology 2009; 18: 7–22. doi: 10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1

12. Squire K, Klopfer E. Augmented reality simulations on handheld computers. Journal of the Learning Sciences 2007; 16(3): 371–413. doi: 10.1080/10508400701413435

13. Cai S, Wang X, Chiang FK. A case study of Augmented Reality simulation system application in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior 2014; 37: 31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.018

14. Cai S, Chiang FK, Wang X. Using the augmented reality 3D technique for a convex imaging experiment in a physics course. International Journal of Engineering Education 2013; 29(4): 856–865. doi: 10.4236/gm.2013.34016

15. Hsiao KF, Chen NS, Huang SY. Learning while exercising for science education in augmented reality among adolescents. Interactive Learning Environments 2012; 20(4): 331–349. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2010.486682

16. Liu TY. A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for language listening and speaking. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2009; 25(6): 515–527. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00329.x




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v6i3.907

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Zhongyin Zhao, Ng Giap Weng, Sabariah Bte Sharif

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/