banner

Machine learning-based smart agricultural practices to assess soil fertility and nutrient dynamics

N. Lakshmi Kalyani, Bhanu Prakash Kolla

Abstract


This research utilises machine learning (ML) to improve agricultural precision by forecasting soil characteristics levels using environmental data. A dataset that comprised additional information on temperature, humidity, soil moisture, nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), and potassium (K) values was used to create models that proposed recommendations for adequate fertilizer application. The performance of models was assessed utilizing R-squared, Adjusted R-squared, mean absolute error (MAE), and mean squared error (MSE). The random forest (RF) model was more accurate than others, showing the lowest MSE for P (mg/kg) and competitive MAE for other characteristics. Gradient boosting models had higher errors and negative R-squared values, suggesting they didn’t fit the data, even though the results were close in performance. Linear regression proved to be reliable with the lowest MAE for N (mg/kg) and K (mg/kg) and the most significant R-squared values for P (mg/kg), showing its persuasiveness in accurately forecasting these characteristic levels despite its simplicity. The research leverages machine learning to precisely predict soil nutrients for smarter farming, with the random forest model providing superior accuracy over other techniques. These advancements highlight the importance of continuous innovation in environmental monitoring for sustainable agriculture.


Keywords


soil nutrients; fertilizer prediction; precision agriculture; artificial intelligence; computer vision; image processing; smart agricultural systems

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. Available online: https://www.agmatix.com/blog/agmatix-powers-open-databases-that-will-revolutionize-crop-nutrition/ (accessed on 2 October 2023).

2. Celik MF, Isik MS, Yuzugullu O, et al. Soil Moisture Prediction from Remote Sensing Images Coupled with Climate, Soil Texture and Topography via Deep Learning. Remote Sensing. 2022; 14(21): 5584. doi: 10.3390/rs14215584

3. Bindraban PS, Dimkpa C, Nagarajan L, et al. Revisiting fertilisers and fertilisation strategies for improved nutrient uptake by plants. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 2015; 51(8): 897-911. doi: 10.1007/s00374-015-1039-7

4. Available online: https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/sustainable-agriculture-23562787 (accessed on 2 October 2023).

5. Goulding K, Jarvis S, Whitmore A. Optimizing nutrient management for farm systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2007; 363(1491): 667-680. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2177

6. Sinha D, Tandon PK. An Overview of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium: Key Players of Nutrition Process in Plants. In: Mishra K, Tandon PK, Srivastava S (editors). Sustainable Solutions for Elemental Deficiency and Excess in Crop Plants. Springer, Singapore. 2020.

7. Available online: https://www.nparks.gov.sg/nparksbuzz/oct-issue-2020/gardening/identifying-nutrient-deficiency-in-plants (accessed on 2 October 2023).

8. Mallah S, Delsouz Khaki B, Davatgar N, et al. Predicting Soil Textural Classes Using Random Forest Models: Learning from Imbalanced Dataset. Agronomy. 2022; 12(11): 2613. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12112613

9. Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, et al. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 4th ed. New York: Garland Science; 2002.

10. Altieri MA, Nicholls CI, Henao A, et al. Agroecology and the design of climate change-resilient farming systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2015; 35(3): 869-890. doi: 10.1007/s13593-015-0285-2

11. Deguine JP, Aubertot JN, Flor RJ, et al. Integrated pest management: good intentions, hard realities. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2021; 41, 38. doi: 10.1007/ s13593-021- 00689-w

12. Sun G, Ding Y, Wang X, et al. Nondestructive Determination of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Contents in Greenhouse Tomato Plants Based on Multispectral Three-Dimensional Imaging. Sensors. 2019; 19(23): 5295. doi: 10.3390/s19235295

13. R M, T A, R S, S R. Soil NPK Prediction Using Multiple Linear Regression. In: Proceedings of the 2022 8th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS); 25–26 March 2022; Coimbatore, India. doi: 10.1109/icaccs54159.2022.9785338

14. Priya R, Ramesh D. Adaboost.RT Based Soil N-P-K Prediction Model for Soil and Crop Specific Data: A Predictive Modelling Approach. In: Mondal A, Gupta H, Srivastava J, et al. (editors). Springer, Cham. 2018.

15. Tatli S, Mirzaee-Ghaleh E, Rabbani H, et al. Prediction of Residual NPK Levels in Crop Fruits by Electronic-Nose VOC Analysis following Application of Multiple Fertilizer Rates. Appl. Sci. 2022; 12: 11263. doi: 10.3390/app122111263

16. Mohapatra AG, Keswani B, Lenka, SK. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science; Udaipur. 2017; 8(7).

17. Dipto SM, Iftekher A, Ghosh T, et al. Suitable Crop Suggesting System Based on N.P.K. Values Using Machine Learning Models. 2021 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering (CSDE). doi: 10.1109/csde53843.2021.9718374

18. Dong Z, Liu Y, Li M, et al. Establishment of an NPK nutrient monitor system in yield-graded cotton petioles under drip irrigation. Plant Methods. 2023; 19(1). doi: 10.1186/s13007-023-01068-0

19. Nooriman WM, Abdullah AH, Abdul Rahim N, et al. Fuzzy logic based prediction of micronutrients demand for harumanis mango growth cycles. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021; 2107(1): 012048. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2107/1/012048

20. Maleki S, Karimi A, Mousavi A, et al. Delineation of Soil Management Zone Maps at the Regional Scale Using Machine Learning. Agronomy. 2023; 13(2): 445. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13020445

21. Khaydukova M, Kirsanov D, Sarkar S, et al. One shot evaluation of NPK in soils by “electronic tongue.” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2021; 186: 106208. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106208

22. John K, Afu SM, Isong IA, et al. Mapping soil properties with soil-environmental covariates using geostatistics and multivariate statistics. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2021; 18(11): 3327-3342. doi: 10.1007/s13762-020-03089-x

23. Li R, Yin B, Cong Y, et al. Simultaneous Prediction of Soil Properties Using Multi_CNN Model. Sensors. 2020; 20(21): 6271. doi: 10.3390/s20216271

24. Fryer MS, Slaton NA, Roberts TL, et al. Validation of Soil‐Test‐Based Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizer Recommendations for Irrigated Soybean. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2019; 83(3): 825-837. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2019.02.0032

25. Emamgholizadeh S, Shahsavani S, Eslami MA. Comparison of artificial neural networks, geographically weighted regression and Cokriging methods for predicting the spatial distribution of soil macronutrients (N, P, and K). Chinese Geographical Science. 2017; 27(5): 747-759. doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0906-6

26. Das K, Twarakavi N, Khiripet N, et al. A Machine Learning Framework for Mapping Soil Nutrients with Multi-Source Data Fusion. 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS. Published online July 11, 2021. doi: 10.1109/igarss47720.2021.9553305

27. Peng Y, Zhao L, Hu Y, et al. Prediction of Soil Nutrient Contents Using Visible and Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2019; 8(10): 437. doi: 10.3390/ijgi8100437

28. Sirsat MS, Cernadas E, Fernández-Delgado M, et al. Automatic prediction of village-wise soil fertility for several nutrients in India using a wide range of regression methods. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2018; 154: 120-133. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.08.003

29. Tziachris P, Aschonitis V, Chatzistathis T, et al. Comparing Machine Learning Models and Hybrid Geostatistical Methods Using Environmental and Soil Covariates for Soil pH Prediction. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2020; 9(4): 276. doi: 10.3390/ijgi9040276




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v7i5.1606

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 N. Lakshmi Kalyani, Bhanu Prakash Kolla

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/